Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16 vs Quadro GP100

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking92not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.48no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Fahrenheit (1998−2000)
GPU code nameGP100NV5 B6
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 October 2016 (8 years ago)22 March 1999 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584no data
Core clock speed1304 MHz100 MHz
Boost clock speed1442 MHzno data
Number of transistors15,300 million15 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)235 Wattno data
Texture fill rate323.00.2
Floating-point processing power10.34 TFLOPSno data
ROPs962
TMUs2242

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2SDR
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 MB
Memory bus width4096 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed715 MHz133 MHz
Memory bandwidth732.2 GB/s1.064 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)6.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.2
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2016 22 March 1999
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 16 MB
Chip lithography 16 nm 250 nm

Quadro GP100 has an age advantage of 17 years, a 102300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1462.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro GP100 and Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro GP100 is a workstation graphics card while Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro GP100
Quadro GP100
NVIDIA Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16
Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 14 votes

Rate Quadro GP100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 25 votes

Rate Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.