Radeon PRO W7800 vs PRO WX 3100

Place in the ranking	566	14
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	5.02	30.89
Power efficiency	7.09	19.58
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Lexa	Navi 31
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	12 June 2017 (7 years ago)	13 April 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$199	$2,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

PRO W7800 has 515% better value for money than PRO WX 3100.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	4480
Core clock speed	925 MHz	1895 MHz
Boost clock speed	1219 MHz	2525 MHz
Number of transistors	2,200 million	57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	260 Watt
Texture fill rate	39.01	707.0
Floating-point processing power	1.248 TFLOPS	45.25 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	128
TMUs	32	280
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	70

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	145 mm	280 mm
Width	1-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	32 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	576.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort

3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO WX 3100 6.69

PRO W7800 73.97
+1006%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

PRO WX 3100 2573

PRO W7800 28439
+1005%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−977%

140−150
+977%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

15.31

+16.6%

17.85
−16.6%

PRO WX 3100 has 17% lower cost per frame in 1080p

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −971%	150−160 +971%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −977%	140−150 +977%
Elden Ring	18−20 −956%	190−200 +956%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −995%	230−240 +995%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −971%	150−160 +971%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −977%	140−150 +977%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −974%	290−300 +974%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −959%	180−190 +959%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 −1005%	210−220 +1005%
Valorant	21−24 −995%	230−240 +995%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −995%	230−240 +995%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −971%	150−160 +971%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −977%	140−150 +977%
Dota 2	21−24 −987%	250−260 +987%
Elden Ring	18−20 −956%	190−200 +956%
Far Cry 5	30−33 −900%	300−310 +900%
Fortnite	25 −980%	270−280 +980%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −974%	290−300 +974%
Grand Theft Auto V	21−24 −987%	250−260 +987%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −959%	180−190 +959%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 −991%	600−650 +991%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 −1005%	210−220 +1005%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −995%	230−240 +995%
Valorant	21−24 −995%	230−240 +995%
World of Tanks	100−110 −958%	1100−1150 +958%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −995%	230−240 +995%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −971%	150−160 +971%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −977%	140−150 +977%
Dota 2	21−24 −987%	250−260 +987%
Far Cry 5	30−33 −900%	300−310 +900%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −974%	290−300 +974%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 −991%	600−650 +991%
Valorant	21−24 −995%	230−240 +995%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	7−8 −971%	75−80 +971%
Elden Ring	8−9 −963%	85−90 +963%
Grand Theft Auto V	7−8 −971%	75−80 +971%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −953%	400−450 +953%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −1000%	55−60 +1000%
World of Tanks	45−50 −942%	500−550 +942%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 −991%	120−130 +991%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −956%	95−100 +956%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −1000%	55−60 +1000%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −971%	150−160 +971%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −983%	130−140 +983%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −956%	95−100 +956%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −963%	85−90 +963%
Valorant	16−18 −959%	180−190 +959%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	0−1	0−1
Dota 2	18−20 −956%	190−200 +956%
Elden Ring	4−5 −900%	40−45 +900%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −959%	180−190 +959%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	18−20 −1005%	210−220 +1005%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −900%	40−45 +900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −959%	180−190 +959%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 −983%	65−70 +983%
Counter-Strike 2	0−1	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
Dota 2	18−20 −956%	190−200 +956%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −963%	85−90 +963%
Fortnite	6−7 −983%	65−70 +983%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −971%	75−80 +971%
Valorant	6−7 −983%	65−70 +983%

This is how PRO WX 3100 and PRO W7800 compete in popular games:

PRO W7800 is 977% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	6.69	73.97
Recency	12 June 2017	13 April 2023
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	32 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	260 Watt

PRO WX 3100 has 300% lower power consumption.

PRO W7800, on the other hand, has a 1005.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon PRO W7800 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon PRO WX 3100 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.