ATI Mobility Radeon X1800XT vs PRO WX 3100

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking560not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.34no data
Power efficiency7.05no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)no data
GPU code nameLexaM58, R520
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date12 June 2017 (7 years ago)1 March 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51224
Core clock speed925 MHz8 MHz
Boost clock speed1219 MHz550 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Wattno data
Texture fill rate39.01no data
Floating-point processing power1.248 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8no data
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz650 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPortno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)GDDR3
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 June 2017 1 March 2006
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm

PRO WX 3100 has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO WX 3100 and Mobility Radeon X1800XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon PRO WX 3100 is a workstation card while Mobility Radeon X1800XT is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100
Radeon PRO WX 3100
ATI Mobility Radeon X1800XT
Mobility Radeon X1800XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 52 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobility Radeon X1800XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.