GeForce GT 130M vs Radeon Pro 555

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking511not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.51no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code namePolaris 21G96C
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date5 June 2017 (7 years ago)8 January 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76832
Core clock speed850 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate40.809.600
Floating-point processing power1.306 TFLOPS0.096 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data144
ROPs168
TMUs4816

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone
SLI options-2-way

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GBUp to 1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1275 MHz500 (DDR2)/800 (GDDR3) MHz
Memory bandwidth81.6 GB/s16 (DDR2)/25 (GDDR3)
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsSingle Link DVIDisplayPortVGAHDMIDual Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
Power managementno data8.0

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 555 3140
+2051%
GT 130M 146

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 June 2017 8 January 2009
Chip lithography 14 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 23 Watt

Pro 555 has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.

GT 130M, on the other hand, has 226.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 555 and GeForce GT 130M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 555 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GT 130M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 555
NVIDIA GeForce GT 130M
GeForce GT 130M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 88 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 555 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 22 votes

Rate GeForce GT 130M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.