Quadro T500 Mobile vs Radeon PRO WX 2100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon PRO WX 2100 Radeon PRO WX 3100 Radeon PRO WX 9100
VS
Quadro T400 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile Quadro T600 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile Quadro T1000 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon PRO WX 2100 with Quadro T500 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

PRO WX 2100
2017
2 GB GDDR5, 35 Watt
4.17

T500 Mobile outperforms PRO WX 2100 by an impressive 86% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
PRO WX 2100 PRO WX 2100
T500 Mobile Quadro T500

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking657501
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.38no data
Power efficiency9.4634.22
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameLexaTU117
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date4 June 2017 (7 years ago)2 December 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512896
Core clock speed925 MHz1365 MHz
Boost clock speed1219 MHz1695 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate39.0194.92
Floating-point processing power1.248 TFLOPS3.037 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs3256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth48 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18−20
−100%
36
+100%
1440p8−9
−87.5%
15
+87.5%
4K9−10
−88.9%
17
+88.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080p8.28no data
1440p18.63no data
4K16.56no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−84.2%
35−40
+84.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−114%
14−16
+114%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−106%
35−40
+106%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−84.2%
35−40
+84.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−150%
30
+150%
Fortnite 24−27
−96.2%
50−55
+96.2%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−76.2%
35−40
+76.2%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
−127%
24−27
+127%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−114%
14−16
+114%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−66.7%
30−33
+66.7%
Valorant 55−60
−44.8%
80−85
+44.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−106%
35−40
+106%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−84.2%
35−40
+84.2%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
−65.8%
130−140
+65.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
Dota 2 35−40
−131%
90
+131%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−133%
28
+133%
Fortnite 24−27
−96.2%
50−55
+96.2%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−76.2%
35−40
+76.2%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
−127%
24−27
+127%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−107%
31
+107%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−114%
14−16
+114%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−113%
16−18
+113%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−66.7%
30−33
+66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−115%
28
+115%
Valorant 55−60
−44.8%
80−85
+44.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−106%
35−40
+106%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
Dota 2 35−40
−92.3%
75
+92.3%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−125%
27
+125%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−76.2%
35−40
+76.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−114%
14−16
+114%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−66.7%
30−33
+66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−46.2%
19
+46.2%
Valorant 55−60
−72.4%
100−105
+72.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
−96.2%
50−55
+96.2%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
−88.2%
60−65
+88.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
−160%
13
+160%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−81.8%
60−65
+81.8%
Valorant 45−50
−93.9%
95−100
+93.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−533%
18−20
+533%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−113%
16−18
+113%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−81.8%
20−22
+81.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
−88.9%
16−18
+88.9%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+14.3%
14
−14.3%
Valorant 21−24
−91.3%
40−45
+91.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
−86.7%
28
+86.7%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%

1440p
High Preset

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
High Preset

Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how PRO WX 2100 and T500 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T500 Mobile is 100% faster in 1080p
  • T500 Mobile is 88% faster in 1440p
  • T500 Mobile is 89% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the PRO WX 2100 is 14% faster.
  • in Battlefield 5, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T500 Mobile is 800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • PRO WX 2100 is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • T500 Mobile is ahead in 46 tests (90%)
  • there's a draw in 4 tests (8%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 4.17 7.76
Recency 4 June 2017 2 December 2020
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 18 Watt

T500 Mobile has a 86.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 94.4% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T500 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon PRO WX 2100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a workstation card while Quadro T500 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
Radeon PRO WX 2100
NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile
Quadro T500
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

PRO WX 2100 Radeon PRO WX 2100
vs
Tesla M2070 Tesla M2070
T500 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile
vs
Pro W5500M Radeon Pro W5500M
PRO WX 2100 Radeon PRO WX 2100
vs
Quadro 5000 Quadro 5000
RX 5700 XT Radeon RX 5700 XT
vs
7800 GTX GeForce 7800 GTX
ATI X1650 Radeon X1650
vs
6700 XL GeForce 6700 XL
GRID M10-8Q GRID M10 8Q
vs
GeForce4 MX 4000 Rev. 2 MX 4000 Rev. 2
ATI FireGL X2-256 FireGL X2 256
vs
ATI FireGL X3-256 X3 256
GeForce 6500 GeForce 6500
vs
NVS 295 NVS 295
HD 6930 Radeon HD 6930
vs
PRO WX 3100 PRO WX 3100
530 Mobile GDDR5 Radeon 530 Mobile GDDR5
vs
P4000 Mobile Quadro P4000 Mobile
RX 7800 XT Radeon RX 7800 XT
vs
Quadro GP100 Quadro GP100
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile
vs
GeForce MX110 GeForce MX110
Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
vs
Tesla V100 SXM2 V100 SXM2

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 50 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 2100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 111 votes

Rate Quadro T500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO WX 2100 or Quadro T500 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.