GeForce GTX 650 vs Radeon PRO W7500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon PRO W7500 with GeForce GTX 650, including specs and performance data.

PRO W7500
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 70 Watt
37.57
+728%

PRO W7500 outperforms GTX 650 by a whopping 728% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking118651
Place by popularitynot in top-10070
Cost-effectiveness evaluation100.001.23
Power efficiency38.725.04
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameNavi 33GK107
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date3 August 2023 (1 year ago)6 September 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$429 $109

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

PRO W7500 has 8030% better value for money than GTX 650.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792384
Core clock speed1500 MHz1058 MHz
Boost clock speed1700 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,300 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt64 Watt
Texture fill rate190.433.86
Floating-point processing power12.19 TFLOPS0.8125 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs11232
Ray Tracing Cores28no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Length216 mm147 mm
Heightno data4.38" (11.1 cm)
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128-bit GDDR5
Memory clock speed1344 MHz5.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth172.0 GB/s80.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.1One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini HDMI
Multi monitor supportno data4 displays
HDMI-+
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray-+
3D Gaming-+
3D Vision-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.75.1
OpenGL4.64.3
OpenCL2.21.2
Vulkan1.31.1.126
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO W7500 37.57
+728%
GTX 650 4.54

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

PRO W7500 14497
+728%
GTX 650 1750

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 37.57 4.54
Recency 3 August 2023 6 September 2012
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 64 Watt

PRO W7500 has a 727.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 650, on the other hand, has 9.4% lower power consumption.

The Radeon PRO W7500 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 650 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W7500 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 650 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO W7500
Radeon PRO W7500
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
GeForce GTX 650

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 17 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 3813 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.