Radeon PRO W7500 vs Pro Vega II Duo

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro Vega II Duo and Radeon PRO W7500, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Pro Vega II Duo
2019
32 GB HBM2, 475 Watt
36.34

PRO W7500 outperforms Pro Vega II Duo by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking131121
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.89100.00
Power efficiency5.2937.11
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameVega 20Navi 33
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)3 August 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,399 $429

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

PRO W7500 has 1351% better value for money than Pro Vega II Duo.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40961792
Core clock speed1400 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed1720 MHz1700 MHz
Number of transistors13,230 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)475 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate440.3190.4
Floating-point processing power14.09 TFLOPS12.19 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs256112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceApple MPXPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data216 mm
WidthQuad-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 GB8 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1344 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.02 TB/s172.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.0b, 4x Thunderbolt4x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.2
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro Vega II Duo 36.34
PRO W7500 37.58
+3.4%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro Vega II Duo 14018
PRO W7500 14497
+3.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 36.34 37.58
Recency 3 June 2019 3 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 475 Watt 70 Watt

Pro Vega II Duo has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

PRO W7500, on the other hand, has a 3.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 578.6% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon Pro Vega II Duo and Radeon PRO W7500.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
AMD Radeon PRO W7500
Radeon PRO W7500

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 182 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega II Duo on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 17 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.