FirePro W600 vs Radeon PRO W7500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon PRO W7500 and FirePro W600, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

PRO W7500
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 70 Watt
37.56
+767%

PRO W7500 outperforms W600 by a whopping 767% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking118668
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation100.000.41
Power efficiency38.754.17
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameNavi 33Cape Verde
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date3 August 2023 (1 year ago)13 June 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$429 $599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

PRO W7500 has 24290% better value for money than FirePro W600.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792512
Core clock speed1500 MHz750 MHz
Boost clock speed1700 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,300 million1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate190.424.00
Floating-point processing power12.19 TFLOPS0.768 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs11232
Ray Tracing Cores28no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Length216 mm163 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1344 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth172.0 GB/s64 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.16x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.75.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.21.2
Vulkan1.31.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO W7500 37.56
+767%
FirePro W600 4.33

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

PRO W7500 14497
+768%
FirePro W600 1671

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 37.56 4.33
Recency 3 August 2023 13 June 2012
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 75 Watt

PRO W7500 has a 767.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 7.1% lower power consumption.

The Radeon PRO W7500 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W600 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO W7500
Radeon PRO W7500
AMD FirePro W600
FirePro W600

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 17 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 10 votes

Rate FirePro W600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.