Data Center GPU Max NEXT vs Radeon Instinct MI300

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCDNA 3.0 (2023−2024)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameAqua VanjaramRialto Bridge
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1408020480
Core clock speed1000 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1700 MHz1600 MHz
Number of transistors153,000 million100,000 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)600 Watt800 Watt
Texture fill rate1,4962,048
Floating-point processing power47.87 TFLOPSno data
TMUs8801280
Tensor Cores880no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slotOAM Module
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM3HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount128 GB128 GB
Memory bus width8192 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed1600 MHz3.1 GB/s
Memory bandwidth3,277 GB/s3,205 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 (12_1)
Shader ModelN/A6.6
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCL3.03.0
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 5 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 600 Watt 800 Watt

Instinct MI300 has a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Instinct MI300 and Data Center GPU Max NEXT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Instinct MI300 is a workstation graphics card while Data Center GPU Max NEXT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Instinct MI300
Radeon Instinct MI300
Intel Data Center GPU Max NEXT
Data Center GPU Max NEXT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 25 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 46 votes

Rate Data Center GPU Max NEXT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.