RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile

Place in the ranking	348	37
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	13.98	26.98
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GP107	no data
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	3 January 2017 (7 years ago)	21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	7424
Core clock speed	1493 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1620 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	3,300 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	150 Watt (60 - 150 Watt TGP)
Maximum GPU temperature	97 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	77.76	no data
Floating-point processing power	2.488 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	32	no data
TMUs	48	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	7 GB/s	16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	112 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	no data
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Ansel

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	-
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 15.29

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile 59.03
+286%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 9616

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile 54921
+471%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 7741

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile 40179
+419%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	56 −275%	210−220 +275%
1440p	25 −280%	95−100 +280%
4K	17 −282%	65−70 +282%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	43 −272%	160−170 +272%
Battlefield 5	59 −273%	220−230 +273%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	47 −283%	180−190 +283%
Far Cry 5	47 −283%	180−190 +283%
Far Cry New Dawn	46 −270%	170−180 +270%
Forza Horizon 4	62 −271%	230−240 +271%
Red Dead Redemption 2	33 −264%	120−130 +264%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	39 −285%	150−160 +285%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	37 −278%	140−150 +278%
Battlefield 5	49 −267%	180−190 +267%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	33 −264%	120−130 +264%
Far Cry 5	44 −264%	160−170 +264%
Far Cry New Dawn	42 −281%	160−170 +281%
Forza Horizon 4	57 −286%	220−230 +286%
Metro Exodus	19 −268%	70−75 +268%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 −281%	160−170 +281%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	33 −264%	120−130 +264%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	47 −283%	180−190 +283%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	23 −270%	85−90 +270%
Battlefield 5	42 −281%	160−170 +281%
Far Cry 5	40 −275%	150−160 +275%
Far Cry New Dawn	38 −268%	140−150 +268%
Forza Horizon 4	43 −272%	160−170 +272%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	26 −285%	100−105 +285%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21 −281%	80−85 +281%
Metro Exodus	12 −275%	45−50 +275%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −280%	95−100 +280%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	17 −282%	65−70 +282%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −267%	55−60 +267%
Battlefield 5	29 −279%	110−120 +279%
Far Cry 5	26 −285%	100−105 +285%
Far Cry New Dawn	27 −270%	100−105 +270%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 −275%	300−310 +275%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4 −250%	14−16 +250%
Metro Exodus	7 −286%	27−30 +286%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −257%	50−55 +257%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8 −275%	30−33 +275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	17 −282%	65−70 +282%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −233%	30−33 +233%
Battlefield 5	14−16 −267%	55−60 +267%
Far Cry 5	12 −275%	45−50 +275%
Far Cry New Dawn	13 −285%	50−55 +285%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −281%	80−85 +281%

This is how GTX 1050 Ti Mobile and RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is 275% faster in 1080p
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is 280% faster in 1440p
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is 282% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	15.29	59.03
Recency	3 January 2017	21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	150 Watt

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile has 100% lower power consumption.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 286.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is a notebook graphics card while RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.