GeForce MX570 vs ATI Radeon IGP 340M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon IGP 340M and GeForce MX570, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI IGP 340M
2002
0.01

MX570 outperforms ATI IGP 340M by a whopping 148700% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1527355
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data40.80
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameRS200GA107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 October 2002 (22 years ago)May 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores22048
Core clock speed183 MHz832 MHz
Boost clock speed180 MHz1155 MHz
Number of transistors30 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology180 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data25 Watt
Texture fill rate0.3773.92
Floating-point processing powerno data4.731 TFLOPS
ROPs240
TMUs264
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data96 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI IGP 340M 0.01
GeForce MX570 14.88
+148700%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI IGP 340M 2
GeForce MX570 5735
+286650%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1050%
21−24
+1050%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1033%
30−35
+1033%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1050%
21−24
+1050%
Hitman 3 4−5
−600%
27−30
+600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−850%
75−80
+850%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−1100%
45−50
+1100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−179%
75−80
+179%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1033%
30−35
+1033%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1050%
21−24
+1050%
Hitman 3 4−5
−600%
27−30
+600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−850%
75−80
+850%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−1100%
45−50
+1100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−179%
75−80
+179%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1033%
30−35
+1033%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1050%
21−24
+1050%
Hitman 3 4−5
−600%
27−30
+600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−850%
75−80
+850%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−1100%
45−50
+1100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−179%
75−80
+179%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 8−9
Hitman 3 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 7−8

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−550%
12−14
+550%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Hitman 3 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GeForce MX570 is 1400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GeForce MX570 is ahead in 29 tests (41%)
  • there's a draw in 41 test (59%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.01 14.88
Chip lithography 180 nm 8 nm

GeForce MX570 has a 148700% higher aggregate performance score, and a 2150% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce MX570 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon IGP 340M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon IGP 340M
Radeon IGP 340M
NVIDIA GeForce MX570
GeForce MX570

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 340M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 93 votes

Rate GeForce MX570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.