GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs ATI Radeon IGP 340M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	1549	308
Place by popularity	not in top-100	32
Power efficiency	no data	28.26
Architecture	Rage 6 (2000−2007)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	RS200	GA107
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	5 October 2002 (22 years ago)	17 December 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2	2048
Core clock speed	183 MHz	1185 MHz
Boost clock speed	180 MHz	1477 MHz
Number of transistors	30 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	180 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	45 Watt
Texture fill rate	0.37	94.53
Floating-point processing power	no data	6.05 TFLOPS
ROPs	2	32
TMUs	2	64
Tensor Cores	no data	256
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	AGP 4x	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	4 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	112.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-
Resizable BAR	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+
G-SYNC support	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	7.0	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.6
OpenGL	1.4	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	-	8.6
DLSS	-	+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	no data	42
1440p	no data	32
4K	no data	28

FPS performance in popular games

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	5 October 2002	17 December 2021
Chip lithography	180 nm	8 nm

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---