RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics with RTX 2000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
2013
2.66

RTX 2000 Ada Generation outperforms HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics by a whopping 1635% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking80572
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data81.72
Power efficiencyno data45.85
Architectureno dataAda Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameno dataAD107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 August 2013 (11 years ago)12 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7682816
Core clock speed720 / 775 MHz1620 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2130 MHz
Number of transistorsno data18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data70 Watt
Texture fill rateno data187.4
Floating-point processing powerno data12 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data88
Tensor Coresno data88
Ray Tracing Coresno data22

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 - 2000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.9

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p29
−1624%
500−550
+1624%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1600%
85−90
+1600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−1567%
150−160
+1567%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Battlefield 5 4−5
−1525%
65−70
+1525%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−1614%
120−130
+1614%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1600%
85−90
+1600%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1600%
85−90
+1600%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−1614%
120−130
+1614%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−1614%
240−250
+1614%
Hitman 3 7−8
−1614%
120−130
+1614%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−1567%
350−400
+1567%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−1567%
100−105
+1567%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−1567%
200−210
+1567%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−1611%
650−700
+1611%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−1567%
150−160
+1567%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Battlefield 5 4−5
−1525%
65−70
+1525%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−1614%
120−130
+1614%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1600%
85−90
+1600%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1600%
85−90
+1600%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−1614%
120−130
+1614%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−1614%
240−250
+1614%
Hitman 3 7−8
−1614%
120−130
+1614%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−1567%
350−400
+1567%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−1567%
100−105
+1567%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−1567%
200−210
+1567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−1614%
240−250
+1614%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−1611%
650−700
+1611%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−1567%
150−160
+1567%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−1614%
120−130
+1614%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1600%
85−90
+1600%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1600%
85−90
+1600%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−1614%
240−250
+1614%
Hitman 3 7−8
−1614%
120−130
+1614%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−1567%
350−400
+1567%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−1567%
200−210
+1567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−1614%
240−250
+1614%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−1611%
650−700
+1611%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−1567%
100−105
+1567%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−1525%
65−70
+1525%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−1525%
65−70
+1525%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1567%
50−55
+1567%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1525%
130−140
+1525%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−1614%
120−130
+1614%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−1588%
270−280
+1588%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−1567%
100−105
+1567%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−1525%
65−70
+1525%

This is how HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics and RTX 2000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 1624% faster in 900p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.66 46.15
Recency 1 August 2013 12 February 2024
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm

RTX 2000 Ada Generation has a 1635% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics is a notebook card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 19 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8650G HD 8670M Dual Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 24 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.