UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs vs Radeon HD 8410G

Place in the ranking	1075	652
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	2.23	11.23
Architecture	TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code name	Scrapper	Tiger Lake Xe
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	23 May 2013 (11 years ago)	15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	48
Core clock speed	600 MHz	350 MHz
Boost clock speed	720 MHz	1450 MHz
Number of transistors	1,303 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	28 Watt
Texture fill rate	8.640	no data
Floating-point processing power	0.2765 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	4	no data
TMUs	12	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	IGP	no data
Width	IGP	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	no data
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	no data
Memory bus width	System Shared	no data
Memory clock speed	System Shared	no data
Shared memory	+	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12_1
Shader Model	5.0	no data
OpenGL	4.4	no data
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	N/A	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

4−5

−325%

17
+325%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

−267%

11
+267%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −160%	12−14 +160%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −550%	12−14 +550%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −2700%	27−30 +2700%
Hitman 3	5−6 −100%	10 +100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −177%	36 +177%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −1100%	12−14 +1100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −143%	16−18 +143%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −40.6%	45−50 +40.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −160%	12−14 +160%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −550%	12−14 +550%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −2700%	27−30 +2700%
Hitman 3	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −131%	30−33 +131%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −1100%	12−14 +1100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −143%	17 +143%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −54.5%	16−18 +54.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −40.6%	45−50 +40.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −160%	12−14 +160%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −2700%	27−30 +2700%
Hitman 3	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +8.3%	12 −8.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −129%	16 +129%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 +37.5%	8 −37.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −40.6%	45−50 +40.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

1−2

−1100%

12−14
+1100%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Hitman 3	7−8 −28.6%	9−10 +28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	4−5
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −460%	27−30 +460%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−100%

8−9
+100%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

0−1

3−4

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	2−3
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	2−3
Far Cry 5	0−1	2−3

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−150%

5−6
+150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12 +0%	12 +0%
Battlefield 5	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Battlefield 5	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

4−5

+0%

4−5

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Metro Exodus	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Hitman 3	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Metro Exodus	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

This is how HD 8410G and UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs compete in popular games:

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is 325% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD 8410G is 38% faster.
in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is 2700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

HD 8410G is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is ahead in 44 tests (71%)
there's a draw in 16 tests (26%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.13	4.55
Recency	23 May 2013	15 August 2020
Chip lithography	32 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	28 Watt

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs has a 302.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8410G in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8410G is a desktop card while UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.