Quadro 5000M vs Radeon HD 7970M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7970M with Quadro 5000M, including specs and performance data.

HD 7970M
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
9.23
+72.8%

HD 7970M outperforms 5000M by an impressive 73% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking473612
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.443.72
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameWimbledonGF100
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date24 April 2012 (12 years ago)27 July 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280320
Core clock speed850 MHz405 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate68.0016.20
Floating-point processing power2.176 TFLOPS0.5184 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs8040

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1792 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHz600 MHz
Memory bandwidth153.6 GB/s76.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7970M 9.23
+72.8%
Quadro 5000M 5.34

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7970M 3559
+72.9%
Quadro 5000M 2059

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 7970M 21938
+182%
Quadro 5000M 7767

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p84
+86.7%
45−50
−86.7%
Full HD61
+74.3%
35−40
−74.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+100%
14−16
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+72.7%
10−12
−72.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+73.3%
14−16
−73.3%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+79.4%
30−35
−79.4%
Hitman 3 16−18
+54.5%
10−12
−54.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+50%
30−35
−50%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+115%
12−14
−115%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+78.6%
14−16
−78.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+57.9%
18−20
−57.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+27.7%
45−50
−27.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+100%
14−16
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+72.7%
10−12
−72.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+73.3%
14−16
−73.3%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+79.4%
30−35
−79.4%
Hitman 3 16−18
+54.5%
10−12
−54.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+50%
30−35
−50%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+115%
12−14
−115%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+78.6%
14−16
−78.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+57.9%
18−20
−57.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+27.7%
45−50
−27.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+72.7%
10−12
−72.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+79.4%
30−35
−79.4%
Hitman 3 16−18
+54.5%
10−12
−54.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+50%
30−35
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+57.9%
18−20
−57.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+27.7%
45−50
−27.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+78.6%
14−16
−78.6%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+200%
12−14
−200%
Hitman 3 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+70.6%
30−35
−70.6%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Hitman 3 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+311%
9−10
−311%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%

This is how HD 7970M and Quadro 5000M compete in popular games:

  • HD 7970M is 87% faster in 900p
  • HD 7970M is 74% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the HD 7970M is 500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, HD 7970M surpassed Quadro 5000M in all 68 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.23 5.34
Recency 24 April 2012 27 July 2010
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1792 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm

HD 7970M has a 72.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 14.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon HD 7970M is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 5000M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7970M is a notebook graphics card while Quadro 5000M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7970M
Radeon HD 7970M
NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
Quadro 5000M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 43 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7970M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Quadro 5000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.