Radeon HD 7770M vs Quadro K5100M

Place in the ranking	505	729
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	5.68	7.35
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code name	GK104	Chelsea
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	23 July 2013 (11 years ago)	24 April 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1536	512
Core clock speed	771 MHz	675 MHz
Number of transistors	3,540 million	1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	32 Watt
Texture fill rate	98.69	21.60
Floating-point processing power	2.369 TFLOPS	0.6912 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	16
TMUs	128	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	115.2 GB/s	64 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.2	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	-
3D Vision Pro	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	+	1.2.131
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

K5100M 8.28
+141%

HD 7770M 3.43

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

K5100M 6880
+226%

HD 7770M 2110

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

K5100M 24795
+137%

HD 7770M 10468

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	51 +143%	21−24 −143%
4K	26 +160%	10−12 −160%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

12−14
+117%

6−7

−117%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22 +100%	10−11 −100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 +450%	2−3 −450%
Battlefield 5	24−27 +243%	7−8 −243%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +100%	8−9 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +117%	6−7 −117%
Far Cry 5	18−20 +157%	7−8 −157%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 +130%	10−11 −130%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +165%	20−22 −165%
Hitman 3	14−16 +66.7%	9−10 −66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 +84%	24−27 −84%
Metro Exodus	24−27 +300%	6−7 −300%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +144%	9−10 −144%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 +92.9%	14−16 −92.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 +39%	40−45 −39%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22 +100%	10−11 −100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 +450%	2−3 −450%
Battlefield 5	24−27 +243%	7−8 −243%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +100%	8−9 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +117%	6−7 −117%
Far Cry 5	18−20 +157%	7−8 −157%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 +130%	10−11 −130%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +165%	20−22 −165%
Hitman 3	14−16 +66.7%	9−10 −66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 +84%	24−27 −84%
Metro Exodus	24−27 +300%	6−7 −300%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +144%	9−10 −144%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 +92.9%	14−16 −92.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	82 +447%	14−16 −447%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 +39%	40−45 −39%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22 +100%	10−11 −100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 +450%	2−3 −450%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +100%	8−9 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +117%	6−7 −117%
Far Cry 5	18−20 +157%	7−8 −157%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +165%	20−22 −165%
Hitman 3	14−16 +66.7%	9−10 −66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 +84%	24−27 −84%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 +92.9%	14−16 −92.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14 −7.1%	14−16 +7.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 +39%	40−45 −39%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24
+144%

9−10

−144%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 +167%	6−7 −167%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Far Cry 5	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +3000%	1−2 −3000%
Hitman 3	10−12 +37.5%	8−9 −37.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 +113%	8−9 −113%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +143%	21−24 −143%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16
+100%

7−8

−100%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Hitman 3	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 +142%	12−14 −142%
Metro Exodus	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10 +150%	4−5 −150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

8−9
+100%

4−5

−100%

This is how K5100M and HD 7770M compete in popular games:

K5100M is 143% faster in 1080p
K5100M is 160% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the K5100M is 3000% faster.
in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD 7770M is 7% faster.

All in all, in popular games: