Radeon RX 6800 XT vs HD 7970M Crossfire

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire with Radeon RX 6800 XT, including specs and performance data.

HD 7970M Crossfire
2012
200 Watt
16.04

RX 6800 XT outperforms HD 7970M Crossfire by a whopping 305% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking33828
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data49.92
Power efficiency5.5214.92
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameWimbledon XTNavi 21
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 May 2012 (12 years ago)28 October 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25604608
Core clock speed850 MHz1825 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2250 MHz
Number of transistorsno data26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rateno data648.0
Floating-point processing powerno data20.74 TFLOPS
ROPsno data128
TMUsno data288
Ray Tracing Coresno data72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus width2x 256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed4800 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7970M Crossfire 16.04
RX 6800 XT 65.03
+305%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 7970M Crossfire 11119
RX 6800 XT 52046
+368%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 7970M Crossfire 31127
RX 6800 XT 96516
+210%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p132
−279%
500−550
+279%
Full HD101
−101%
203
+101%
1440p35−40
−314%
145
+314%
4K24−27
−317%
100
+317%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.20
1440pno data4.48
4Kno data6.49

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−443%
150−160
+443%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−366%
140−150
+366%
Elden Ring 45−50
−406%
240−250
+406%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
−125%
110−120
+125%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−443%
150−160
+443%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−366%
140−150
+366%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−512%
404
+512%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−189%
127
+189%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−213%
122
+213%
Valorant 60−65
−527%
401
+527%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
−125%
110−120
+125%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−443%
150−160
+443%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−366%
140−150
+366%
Dota 2 55−60
−172%
155
+172%
Elden Ring 45−50
−406%
240−250
+406%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
58
+0%
Fortnite 85−90
−189%
250−260
+189%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−438%
355
+438%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
−163%
150
+163%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−173%
120
+173%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
−88.6%
210−220
+88.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−231%
129
+231%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−255%
170−180
+255%
Valorant 60−65
−170%
173
+170%
World of Tanks 200−210
−37.4%
270−280
+37.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
−125%
110−120
+125%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−443%
150−160
+443%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−366%
140−150
+366%
Dota 2 55−60
−154%
145
+154%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−116%
120−130
+116%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−358%
302
+358%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
−88.6%
210−220
+88.6%
Valorant 60−65
−456%
356
+456%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 24−27
−400%
120
+400%
Elden Ring 24−27
−560%
160−170
+560%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−400%
120
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
−17.4%
170−180
+17.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−493%
83
+493%
World of Tanks 110−120
−298%
400−450
+298%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−172%
85−90
+172%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−500%
80−85
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−600%
80−85
+600%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−300%
160−170
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−455%
222
+455%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−220%
112
+220%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−567%
140−150
+567%
Valorant 40−45
−595%
278
+595%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−558%
75−80
+558%
Dota 2 27−30
−379%
134
+379%
Elden Ring 10−12
−691%
85−90
+691%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
−396%
134
+396%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−409%
56
+409%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−335%
200−210
+335%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−430%
53
+430%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−396%
134
+396%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−460%
80−85
+460%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−558%
75−80
+558%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%
Dota 2 27−30
−336%
122
+336%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−425%
100−110
+425%
Fortnite 18−20
−433%
95−100
+433%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−478%
133
+478%
Valorant 18−20
−750%
153
+750%

This is how HD 7970M Crossfire and RX 6800 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6800 XT is 279% faster in 900p
  • RX 6800 XT is 101% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6800 XT is 314% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6800 XT is 317% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6800 XT is 900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6800 XT is ahead in 62 tests (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.04 65.03
Recency 1 May 2012 28 October 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 300 Watt

HD 7970M Crossfire has 50% lower power consumption.

RX 6800 XT, on the other hand, has a 305.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6800 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6800 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
Radeon RX 6800 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 19 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 3649 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.