NVS 315 vs Radeon HD 7870

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7870 with NVS 315, including specs and performance data.

HD 7870
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 175 Watt
12.00
+1233%

HD 7870 outperforms NVS 315 by a whopping 1233% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4051126
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.990.07
Power efficiency4.703.25
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code namePitcairnGF119
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date5 March 2012 (12 years ago)10 March 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$349 $159

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

HD 7870 has 4171% better value for money than NVS 315.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128048
Core clock speed1000 MHz523 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million292 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)175 Watt19 Watt
Texture fill rate80.004.184
Floating-point processing power2.56 TFLOPS0.1004 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs808

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length241 mm145 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHz875 MHz
Memory bandwidth153.6 GB/s14 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort1x DMS-59
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-2.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7870 12.00
+1233%
NVS 315 0.90

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7870 4625
+1237%
NVS 315 346

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p84
+1300%
6−7
−1300%
Full HD69
+1280%
5−6
−1280%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.0631.80

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+1300%
2−3
−1300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+1800%
2−3
−1800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+1300%
2−3
−1300%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+1233%
6−7
−1233%
Hitman 3 21−24
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+1500%
4−5
−1500%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+1233%
3−4
−1233%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+1850%
2−3
−1850%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+1280%
5−6
−1280%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+1300%
2−3
−1300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+1800%
2−3
−1800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+1300%
2−3
−1300%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+1233%
6−7
−1233%
Hitman 3 21−24
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+1500%
4−5
−1500%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+1233%
3−4
−1233%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+1850%
2−3
−1850%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+1400%
2−3
−1400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+1280%
5−6
−1280%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+1300%
2−3
−1300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+1300%
2−3
−1300%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+1233%
6−7
−1233%
Hitman 3 21−24
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+1500%
4−5
−1500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+1850%
2−3
−1850%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+1280%
5−6
−1280%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 0−1
Far Cry 5 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+1350%
4−5
−1350%
Hitman 3 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+2400%
1−2
−2400%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+1400%
5−6
−1400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10 0−1
Hitman 3 8−9 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+1300%
4−5
−1300%
Metro Exodus 10−12 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 6−7 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12 0−1

This is how HD 7870 and NVS 315 compete in popular games:

  • HD 7870 is 1300% faster in 900p
  • HD 7870 is 1280% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.00 0.90
Recency 5 March 2012 10 March 2013
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 175 Watt 19 Watt

HD 7870 has a 1233.3% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 315, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 821.1% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 7870 is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 315 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7870 is a desktop card while NVS 315 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7870
Radeon HD 7870
NVIDIA NVS 315
NVS 315

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 641 vote

Rate Radeon HD 7870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 179 votes

Rate NVS 315 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.