Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs Radeon HD 7870

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7870 with Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), including specs and performance data.

HD 7870
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 175 Watt
12.02
+122%

HD 7870 outperforms Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) by a whopping 122% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking403608
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.91no data
Power efficiency4.7514.96
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code namePitcairnIce Lake G7 Gen. 11
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date5 March 2012 (12 years ago)28 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$349 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128064
Core clock speed1000 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1100 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)175 Watt12-25 Watt
Texture fill rate80.00no data
Floating-point processing power2.56 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs80no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR4
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1200 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth153.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPortno data
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12_1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7870 12.02
+122%
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 5.41

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 7870 6194
+47.9%
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 4187

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 7870 21348
+47.8%
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 14442

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p84
+140%
35−40
−140%
Full HD68
+300%
17
−300%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.13no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+111%
9−10
−111%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+86.7%
14−16
−86.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+217%
6−7
−217%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+153%
14−16
−153%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+100%
12−14
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+111%
9−10
−111%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+133%
12
−133%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+267%
9
−267%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+122%
35−40
−122%
Hitman 3 21−24
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+82.9%
35−40
−82.9%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+122%
18
−122%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+175%
12
−175%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+95%
20−22
−95%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+25.5%
55
−25.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+86.7%
14−16
−86.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+217%
6−7
−217%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+153%
14−16
−153%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+100%
12−14
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+111%
9−10
−111%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+155%
11
−155%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+725%
4
−725%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+122%
35−40
−122%
Hitman 3 21−24
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+82.9%
35−40
−82.9%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+186%
14
−186%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+267%
9
−267%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+129%
17
−129%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+57.9%
18−20
−57.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+35.3%
51
−35.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+86.7%
14−16
−86.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+217%
6−7
−217%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+100%
12−14
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+111%
9−10
−111%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+133%
12−14
−133%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+122%
35−40
−122%
Hitman 3 21−24
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+482%
11
−482%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+160%
15
−160%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
+122%
9
−122%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+43.8%
45−50
−43.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+120%
14−16
−120%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+130%
10−11
−130%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+125%
8−9
−125%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+287%
14−16
−287%
Hitman 3 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+108%
12−14
−108%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+375%
4−5
−375%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+114%
35−40
−114%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+100%
10−11
−100%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Hitman 3 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+409%
10−12
−409%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%

This is how HD 7870 and Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) compete in popular games:

  • HD 7870 is 140% faster in 900p
  • HD 7870 is 300% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry New Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the HD 7870 is 725% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, HD 7870 surpassed Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) in all 69 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.02 5.41
Recency 5 March 2012 28 May 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 175 Watt 12 Watt

HD 7870 has a 122.2% higher aggregate performance score.

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 1358.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 7870 is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7870 is a desktop card while Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7870
Radeon HD 7870
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 640 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 237 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.