T400 vs Radeon HD 7770

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7770 with T400, including specs and performance data.

HD 7770
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 80 Watt
5.63

T400 outperforms HD 7770 by an impressive 66% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking612479
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.45no data
Power efficiency4.8421.49
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameCape VerdeTU117
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date15 February 2012 (13 years ago)6 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$159 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640384
Core clock speed1000 MHz420 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1425 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate40.0034.20
Floating-point processing power1.28 TFLOPS1.094 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs4024

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length210 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1125 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort3x mini-DisplayPort
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 7770 5.63
T400 9.37
+66.4%

  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7770 2171
T400 3609
+66.2%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p47
−59.6%
75−80
+59.6%
Full HD47
−59.6%
75−80
+59.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.38no data

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Atomic Heart 12−14
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%
Atomic Heart 12−14
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−59.1%
35−40
+59.1%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%
Fortnite 30−35
−56.3%
50−55
+56.3%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−45.8%
35−40
+45.8%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%
Valorant 60−65
−58.7%
100−105
+58.7%
Atomic Heart 12−14
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−59.1%
35−40
+59.1%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 128
−64.1%
210−220
+64.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%
Dota 2 40−45
−59.1%
70−75
+59.1%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%
Fortnite 30−35
−56.3%
50−55
+56.3%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−45.8%
35−40
+45.8%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−50%
27−30
+50%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
Valorant 60−65
−58.7%
100−105
+58.7%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−59.1%
35−40
+59.1%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%
Dota 2 40−45
−59.1%
70−75
+59.1%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−45.8%
35−40
+45.8%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
Valorant 60−65
−58.7%
100−105
+58.7%
Fortnite 30−35
−56.3%
50−55
+56.3%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
−58.5%
65−70
+58.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−57.1%
55−60
+57.1%
Valorant 55−60
−61%
95−100
+61%
Battlefield 5 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Fortnite 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
Atomic Heart 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−58.8%
27−30
+58.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Valorant 27−30
−48.1%
40−45
+48.1%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Dota 2 18−20
−50%
27−30
+50%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Fortnite 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%

This is how HD 7770 and T400 compete in popular games:

  • T400 is 60% faster in 900p
  • T400 is 60% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.63 9.37
Recency 15 February 2012 6 May 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 30 Watt

T400 has a 66.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 166.7% lower power consumption.

The T400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7770 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7770 is a desktop card while T400 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7770
Radeon HD 7770
NVIDIA T400
T400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7
954 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8
382 votes

Rate T400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7770 or T400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.