Quadro RTX 6000 vs Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics with Quadro RTX 6000, including specs and performance data.

HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
2012
2.09

RTX 6000 outperforms HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics by a whopping 2223% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking87065
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.24
Power efficiencyno data12.93
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameno dataTU102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 May 2012 (12 years ago)13 August 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8624608
Core clock speed685 / 600 MHz1440 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1770 MHz
Number of transistorsno data18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data260 Watt
Texture fill rateno data509.8
Floating-point processing powerno data16.31 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data288
Tensor Coresno data576
Ray Tracing Coresno data72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3,GDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data24 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data672.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD19
−2005%
400−450
+2005%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data15.75

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−2186%
160−170
+2186%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−2150%
180−190
+2150%
Hitman 3 7−8
−2186%
160−170
+2186%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−2122%
400−450
+2122%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−2200%
230−240
+2200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−2122%
800−850
+2122%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−2186%
160−170
+2186%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−2150%
180−190
+2150%
Hitman 3 7−8
−2186%
160−170
+2186%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−2122%
400−450
+2122%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−2200%
230−240
+2200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−2150%
270−280
+2150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−2122%
800−850
+2122%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−2186%
160−170
+2186%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−2150%
180−190
+2150%
Hitman 3 7−8
−2186%
160−170
+2186%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−2122%
400−450
+2122%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−2200%
230−240
+2200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−2150%
270−280
+2150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−2122%
800−850
+2122%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Hitman 3 7−8
−2186%
160−170
+2186%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
−2067%
130−140
+2067%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
−2173%
250−260
+2173%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%

This is how HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics and RTX 6000 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 6000 is 2005% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.09 48.56
Recency 15 May 2012 13 August 2018
Chip lithography 32 nm 12 nm

RTX 6000 has a 2223.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 166.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro RTX 6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics is a notebook card while Quadro RTX 6000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Quadro RTX 6000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 57 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7660G HD 7670M Dual Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 129 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.