GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Radeon HD 7640G

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7640G with GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

HD 7640G
2012
35 Watt
1.19

RTX 2050 Mobile outperforms HD 7640G by a whopping 1466% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1053293
Place by popularitynot in top-10017
Power efficiency2.4529.89
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameDevastator LiteGA107
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date15 May 2012 (12 years ago)17 December 2021 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2562048
Core clock speed496 MHz1185 MHz
Boost clock speed685 MHz1477 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology32 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate10.9694.53
Floating-point processing power0.3507 TFLOPS6.05 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs1664
Tensor Coresno data256
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x8
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data112.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.6
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7640G 1.19
RTX 2050 Mobile 18.64
+1466%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 7640G 2599
RTX 2050 Mobile 46821
+1702%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 7640G 656
RTX 2050 Mobile 12340
+1783%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD2−3
−2150%
45
+2150%
1440p2−3
−1700%
36
+1700%
4K1−2
−2900%
30
+2900%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1533%
49
+1533%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−740%
40−45
+740%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−850%
35−40
+850%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1300%
42
+1300%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−4300%
40−45
+4300%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−1567%
50−55
+1567%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−11600%
110−120
+11600%
Hitman 3 6−7
−633%
44
+633%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−550%
90−95
+550%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−663%
60−65
+663%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−175%
85−90
+175%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−740%
40−45
+740%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−850%
35−40
+850%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−900%
30
+900%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−4300%
40−45
+4300%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−1567%
50−55
+1567%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−11600%
110−120
+11600%
Hitman 3 6−7
−617%
43
+617%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−550%
90−95
+550%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−675%
62
+675%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−282%
40−45
+282%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−175%
85−90
+175%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−740%
40−45
+740%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−850%
35−40
+850%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−733%
25
+733%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−4300%
40−45
+4300%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−11600%
110−120
+11600%
Hitman 3 6−7
−550%
39
+550%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−550%
90−95
+550%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−588%
55
+588%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−200%
33
+200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+77.8%
18
−77.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−3500%
35−40
+3500%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−1300%
27−30
+1300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−1800%
18−20
+1800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 21−24
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1000%
10−12
+1000%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2100%
21−24
+2100%
Hitman 3 7−8
−214%
21−24
+214%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−850%
35−40
+850%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 21−24
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−2120%
110−120
+2120%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−675%
30−35
+675%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 14−16

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−1000%
10−12
+1000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 10−11
Far Cry 5 0−1 10−11

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 42
+0%
42
+0%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21
+0%
21
+0%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7
+0%
7
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 47
+0%
47
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Hitman 3 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

This is how HD 7640G and RTX 2050 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 2150% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 1700% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 2900% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD 7640G is 78% faster.
  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 2050 Mobile is 11600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD 7640G is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • RTX 2050 Mobile is ahead in 46 tests (69%)
  • there's a draw in 20 tests (30%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.19 18.64
Recency 15 May 2012 17 December 2021
Chip lithography 32 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 45 Watt

HD 7640G has 28.6% lower power consumption.

RTX 2050 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 1466.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7640G in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7640G is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7640G
Radeon HD 7640G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 165 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7640G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 2002 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.