RTX A4500 Mobile vs Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire with RTX A4500 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

HD 6970M Crossfire
2011
2x2 GB GDDR5
9.12

RTX A4500 Mobile outperforms HD 6970M Crossfire by a whopping 396% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking47576
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data22.35
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameBlackcomb XTGA104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date6 January 2011 (13 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19205888
Core clock speed680 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1500 MHz
Number of transistors2x1700 Million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data140 Watt
Texture fill rateno data276.0
Floating-point processing powerno data17.66 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data184
Tensor Coresno data184
Ray Tracing Coresno data46

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2x2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p94
−379%
450−500
+379%
Full HD101
−395%
500−550
+395%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+633%
3−4
−633%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−362%
60−65
+362%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−364%
130−140
+364%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−376%
100−105
+376%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−380%
120−130
+380%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−392%
300−310
+392%
Hitman 3 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+538%
8−9
−538%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−364%
130−140
+364%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−380%
120−130
+380%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+650%
4−5
−650%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+114%
27−30
−114%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+633%
3−4
−633%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−362%
60−65
+362%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−364%
130−140
+364%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−376%
100−105
+376%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−380%
120−130
+380%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−392%
300−310
+392%
Hitman 3 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+538%
8−9
−538%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−364%
130−140
+364%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−380%
120−130
+380%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+650%
4−5
−650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+178%
9−10
−178%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+114%
27−30
−114%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+633%
3−4
−633%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−362%
60−65
+362%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−376%
100−105
+376%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−392%
300−310
+392%
Hitman 3 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+538%
8−9
−538%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+650%
4−5
−650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+178%
9−10
−178%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+114%
27−30
−114%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−380%
120−130
+380%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−372%
85−90
+372%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−364%
65−70
+364%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−344%
40−45
+344%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−344%
40−45
+344%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−11
−350%
45−50
+350%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−387%
190−200
+387%
Hitman 3 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−362%
60−65
+362%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−350%
45−50
+350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
−383%
280−290
+383%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%
Hitman 3 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−386%
180−190
+386%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−355%
50−55
+355%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%

This is how HD 6970M Crossfire and RTX A4500 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX A4500 Mobile is 379% faster in 900p
  • RTX A4500 Mobile is 395% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the HD 6970M Crossfire is 850% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, HD 6970M Crossfire surpassed RTX A4500 Mobile in all 29 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.12 45.26
Recency 6 January 2011 22 March 2022
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm

RTX A4500 Mobile has a 396.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A4500 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is a notebook graphics card while RTX A4500 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile
RTX A4500 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 17 votes

Rate RTX A4500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.