GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile vs Radeon HD 6750M

Place in the ranking	842	217
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	4.80	28.89
Architecture	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Whistler	GN20-P0-R 6 GB
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	4 January 2011 (14 years ago)	6 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	480	2560
Core clock speed	600 MHz	1237 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1492 MHz
Number of transistors	716 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	14.40	no data
Floating-point processing power	0.576 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	8	no data
TMUs	24	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	large
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	96 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12_2
Shader Model	5.0	no data
OpenGL	4.4	no data
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	N/A	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 6750M 2.44

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile 25.18
+932%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 6750M 1159

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile 17421
+1404%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	21 −900%	210−220 +900%
Full HD	24 −188%	69 +188%
1440p	3−4 −1133%	37 +1133%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −370%	45−50 +370%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −1250%	81 +1250%
Elden Ring	4−5 −1975%	80−85 +1975%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 −1440%	75−80 +1440%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −370%	45−50 +370%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −433%	32 +433%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −775%	105 +775%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −2100%	65−70 +2100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 −511%	55−60 +511%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 −1440%	75−80 +1440%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −300%	40 +300%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −283%	23 +283%
Dota 2	6−7 −917%	61 +917%
Elden Ring	4−5 −1975%	80−85 +1975%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −547%	97 +547%
Fortnite	12−14 −869%	120−130 +869%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −617%	86 +617%
Grand Theft Auto V	6−7 −1417%	91 +1417%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −2100%	65−70 +2100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	21−24 −587%	150−160 +587%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 −511%	55−60 +511%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −720%	80−85 +720%
World of Tanks	45−50 −476%	250−260 +476%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 −1440%	75−80 +1440%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −370%	45−50 +370%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −217%	19 +217%
Dota 2	6−7 −1333%	85−90 +1333%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −413%	75−80 +413%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −533%	76 +533%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	21−24 −587%	150−160 +587%

1440p
High Preset

Elden Ring	2−3 −2100%	40−45 +2100%
Grand Theft Auto V	0−1	40
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	16−18 −929%	170−180 +929%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −2200%	21−24 +2200%
World of Tanks	16−18 −938%	160−170 +938%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −5000%	50−55 +5000%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −133%	21−24 +133%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −600%	21−24 +600%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −957%	70−75 +957%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −825%	37 +825%
Valorant	9−10 −656%	65−70 +656%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −175%	40−45 +175%
Elden Ring	1−2 −1900%	20−22 +1900%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −193%	40−45 +193%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −1000%	75−80 +1000%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −1500%	16−18 +1500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −193%	40−45 +193%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −1200%	24−27 +1200%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%
Dota 2	16−18 −175%	40−45 +175%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −1550%	30−35 +1550%
Fortnite	1−2 −3000%	30−35 +3000%
Valorant	2−3 −1550%	30−35 +1550%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Valorant

100−110

+0%

100−110

+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Valorant

100−110

+0%

100−110

+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Valorant

100−110

+0%

100−110

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4	57 +0%	57 +0%
Metro Exodus	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%

This is how HD 6750M and RTX 3050 6GB Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 900% faster in 900p
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 188% faster in 1080p
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 1133% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Battlefield 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 5000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is ahead in 52 tests (84%)
there's a draw in 10 tests (16%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.44	25.18
Recency	4 January 2011	6 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	60 Watt

HD 6750M has 71.4% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile, on the other hand, has a 932% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6750M in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.