Radeon 740M vs HD 6650M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6650M and Radeon 740M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 6650M
2011
1 GB DDR3
1.95

740M outperforms HD 6650M by a whopping 326% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking903505
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data37.93
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameWhistlerPhoenix
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 January 2011 (13 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480256
Core clock speed600 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2500 MHz
Number of transistors716 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate14.4040.00
Floating-point processing power0.576 TFLOPS2.56 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs2416
Ray Tracing Coresno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.7
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 6650M 1.95
Radeon 740M 8.30
+326%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 6650M 752
Radeon 740M 3199
+325%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 6650M 1037
Radeon 740M 7490
+622%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p19
−321%
80−85
+321%
Full HD18
−16.7%
21
+16.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−567%
20−22
+567%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−400%
24−27
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−638%
55−60
+638%
Hitman 3 6−7
−183%
16−18
+183%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−194%
50−55
+194%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−190%
27−30
+190%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−68.6%
55−60
+68.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−567%
20−22
+567%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−400%
24−27
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−638%
55−60
+638%
Hitman 3 6−7
−183%
16−18
+183%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−194%
50−55
+194%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−190%
27−30
+190%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−108%
24−27
+108%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−68.6%
55−60
+68.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−567%
20−22
+567%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−638%
55−60
+638%
Hitman 3 6−7
−183%
16−18
+183%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−194%
50−55
+194%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−190%
27−30
+190%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−108%
24−27
+108%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−68.6%
55−60
+68.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−467%
16−18
+467%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−333%
12−14
+333%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Hitman 3 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
−409%
55−60
+409%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−200%
14−16
+200%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 4−5
Far Cry 5 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 3−4

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Hitman 3 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how HD 6650M and Radeon 740M compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 740M is 321% faster in 900p
  • Radeon 740M is 17% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Radeon 740M is 2600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Radeon 740M is ahead in 53 tests (76%)
  • there's a draw in 17 tests (24%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.95 8.30
Recency 4 January 2011 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 40 nm 4 nm

Radeon 740M has a 325.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and a 900% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 740M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6650M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6650M
Radeon HD 6650M
AMD Radeon 740M
Radeon 740M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 54 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6650M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 72 votes

Rate Radeon 740M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.