Radeon Pro 5300 vs GeForce 405M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated297
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGT2xx (2009−2012)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameGT218Navi 14
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date11 May 2012 (12 years ago)4 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores161280
CUDA cores16no data
Core clock speed606 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Number of transistors260 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rate4.848132.0
Floating-point performance0.03878 gflops4.224 gflops
Gigaflops73no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3, DDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountUp to 512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedUp to 800 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz14 GB/s
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDisplayPort, HDMI, VGA, Dual Link DVI, Single Link DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 May 2012 4 August 2020
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 85 Watt

GeForce 405M has 507.1% lower power consumption.

Pro 5300, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 405M and Radeon Pro 5300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 405M is a notebook card while Radeon Pro 5300 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 405M
GeForce 405M
AMD Radeon Pro 5300
Radeon Pro 5300

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 15 votes

Rate GeForce 405M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 95 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.