GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 vs Radeon HD 6650M

Place in the ranking	898	720
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.19
Power efficiency	no data	5.01
Architecture	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)	Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code name	Whistler	GK208
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	4 January 2011 (13 years ago)	29 May 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$89

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	480	384
Core clock speed	600 MHz	1046 MHz
Number of transistors	716 million	915 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	49 Watt
Texture fill rate	14.40	33.47
Floating-point processing power	0.576 TFLOPS	0.8033 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	24	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x8
Length	no data	145 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	1252 MHz
Memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	40.06 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA	-	3.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	19 −57.9%	30−35 +57.9%
Full HD	17 −76.5%	30−35 +76.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

no data

2.97

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5

−75%

7−8
+75%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −71.4%	12−14 +71.4%
Battlefield 5	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −80%	9−10 +80%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −80%	9−10 +80%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −75%	14−16 +75%
Hitman 3	6−7 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −76.5%	30−33 +76.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −80%	18−20 +80%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −71.4%	60−65 +71.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −71.4%	12−14 +71.4%
Battlefield 5	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −80%	9−10 +80%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −80%	9−10 +80%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −75%	14−16 +75%
Hitman 3	6−7 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −76.5%	30−33 +76.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −80%	18−20 +80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −75%	21−24 +75%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −71.4%	60−65 +71.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −71.4%	12−14 +71.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −80%	9−10 +80%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −75%	14−16 +75%
Hitman 3	6−7 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −76.5%	30−33 +76.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −80%	18−20 +80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −75%	21−24 +75%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −71.4%	60−65 +71.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−75%

7−8
+75%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Hitman 3	7−8 −71.4%	12−14 +71.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−12 −63.6%	18−20 +63.6%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6

−80%

9−10
+80%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

1−2

+0%

1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	0−1