Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs ATI FirePro M5800

Place in the ranking	999	690
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	3.80	18.87
Architecture	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)	Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code name	Madison	Broadwell GT3e
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	1 March 2010 (14 years ago)	5 September 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	400	384
Core clock speed	650 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	800 MHz
Number of transistors	627 million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	26 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	13.00	38.40
Floating-point processing power	0.52 TFLOPS	0.6144 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	6
TMUs	20	48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	IGP
Width	no data	IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	128 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	51.2 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.4
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.80

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−186%

60−65
+186%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5
−150%

10−11

+150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −167%	16−18 +167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Hitman 3	6−7 −167%	16−18 +167%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −167%	40−45 +167%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −163%	21−24 +163%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −173%	90−95 +173%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −167%	16−18 +167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Hitman 3	6−7 −167%	16−18 +167%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −167%	40−45 +167%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −163%	21−24 +163%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −173%	30−33 +173%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −173%	90−95 +173%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −167%	16−18 +167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Hitman 3	6−7 −167%	16−18 +167%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −167%	40−45 +167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −163%	21−24 +163%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −173%	30−33 +173%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −173%	90−95 +173%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−150%

5−6
+150%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Hitman 3	7−8 −157%	18−20 +157%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 −157%	18−20 +157%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5
−150%

10−11

+150%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

1−2

−100%

2−3
+100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−167%

8−9
+167%

This is how ATI M5800 and Iris Pro Graphics P6300 compete in popular games:

Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is 186% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.44	4.13
Recency	1 March 2010	5 September 2014
Chip lithography	40 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	26 Watt	15 Watt

Iris Pro Graphics P6300 has a 186.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 73.3% lower power consumption.

The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro M5800 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro M5800 is a mobile workstation card while Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.