Radeon E9260 MXM vs ATI HD 4770

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking844not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.37no data
Power efficiency2.06no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameRV740Baffin
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date28 April 2009 (15 years ago)27 September 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$109 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640896
Core clock speed750 MHz1090 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1200 MHz
Number of transistors826 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate24.0057.60
Floating-point processing power0.96 TFLOPS2.15 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs3248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)
Length203 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s112.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model4.16.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 April 2009 27 September 2016
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 50 Watt

E9260 MXM has an age advantage of 7 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 60% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4770 and Radeon E9260 MXM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4770 is a desktop card while Radeon E9260 MXM is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4770
Radeon HD 4770
AMD Radeon E9260 MXM
Radeon E9260 MXM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 72 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon E9260 MXM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.