HD Graphics 400 vs ATI Radeon HD 4250

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 4250 with HD Graphics 400, including specs and performance data.

ATI HD 4250
2009
512 MB DDR2, 25 Watt
0.32

HD Graphics 400 outperforms ATI HD 4250 by a whopping 253% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13111078
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.8812.91
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code nameRV620Braswell GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date25 February 2009 (15 years ago)1 April 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096
Core clock speed594 MHz320 MHz
Boost clock speedno data600 MHz
Number of transistors181 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt6 Watt
Texture fill rate2.3767.200
Floating-point processing power0.04752 TFLOPS0.1152 TFLOPS
ROPs42
TMUs412

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16Ring Bus
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2DDR3L
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed396 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth6.336 GB/sno data
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.15.1
OpenGL3.34.3
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Hitman 3 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−239%
95−100
+239%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Hitman 3 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−239%
95−100
+239%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Hitman 3 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−239%
95−100
+239%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Hitman 3 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.32 1.13
Recency 25 February 2009 1 April 2015
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 6 Watt

HD Graphics 400 has a 253.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 292.9% more advanced lithography process, and 316.7% lower power consumption.

The HD Graphics 400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4250 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4250 is a desktop card while HD Graphics 400 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4250
Radeon HD 4250
Intel HD Graphics 400
HD Graphics 400

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 83 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 416 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.