Arc A380M vs Radeon Graphics

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking897not rated
Place by popularity10not in top-100
Power efficiency9.21no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameRenoirDG2-128
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)24 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4481024
Core clock speedno data1550 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistorsno data7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate42.00128.0
Floating-point processing power1.344 TFLOPS4.096 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2864
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPMXM-A (3.1)
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared6 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared96 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1937 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data186.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

Graphics has 133.3% lower power consumption.

Arc A380M, on the other hand, has a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics and Arc A380M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics is a desktop card while Arc A380M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Graphics
Radeon Graphics
Intel Arc A380M
Arc A380M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 6245 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 8 votes

Rate Arc A380M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.