RTX A2000 12 GB vs GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile

Place in the ranking	132	140
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	88.55
Power efficiency	21.87	34.83
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	TU104B	GA106
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	2 April 2020 (4 years ago)	23 November 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	3328
Core clock speed	1140 MHz	562 MHz
Boost clock speed	1380 MHz	1200 MHz
Number of transistors	13,600 million	12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	115 Watt	70 Watt
Texture fill rate	220.8	124.8
Floating-point processing power	7.066 TFLOPS	7.987 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	48
TMUs	160	104
Tensor Cores	320	104
Ray Tracing Cores	40	26

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	167 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	288.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	4x mini-DisplayPort
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.140	1.3
CUDA	7.5	8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	120 +9.1%	110−120 −9.1%
1440p	77 +10%	70−75 −10%
4K	45 +12.5%	40−45 −12.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	4.08
1440p	no data	6.41
4K	no data	11.23

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

60−65
+5%

60−65

−5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	104 +4%	100−105 −4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	83 +3.8%	80−85 −3.8%
Battlefield 5	110−120 +7.3%	110−120 −7.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	115 +4.5%	110−120 −4.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 +5%	60−65 −5%
Far Cry 5	146 +4.3%	140−150 −4.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	162 +8%	150−160 −8%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 +8.2%	170−180 −8.2%
Hitman 3	105 +5%	100−105 −5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	150−160 +3.3%	150−160 −3.3%
Metro Exodus	144 +10.8%	130−140 −10.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	119 +8.2%	110−120 −8.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	130−140 +10%	120−130 −10%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 +4.2%	120−130 −4.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	75−80 +4%	75−80 −4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	71 +9.2%	65−70 −9.2%
Battlefield 5	110−120 +7.3%	110−120 −7.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	101 +6.3%	95−100 −6.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 +5%	60−65 −5%
Far Cry 5	119 +8.2%	110−120 −8.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	112 +12%	100−105 −12%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 +8.2%	170−180 −8.2%
Hitman 3	104 +4%	100−105 −4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	150−160 +3.3%	150−160 −3.3%
Metro Exodus	144 +10.8%	130−140 −10.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	97 +7.8%	90−95 −7.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	130−140 +10%	120−130 −10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	75−80 +8.6%	70−75 −8.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 +4.2%	120−130 −4.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	63 +5%	60−65 −5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	61 +10.9%	55−60 −10.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	75 +7.1%	70−75 −7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 +5%	60−65 −5%
Far Cry 5	83 +3.8%	80−85 −3.8%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 +8.2%	170−180 −8.2%
Hitman 3	92 +8.2%	85−90 −8.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	121 +10%	110−120 −10%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	130−140 +10%	120−130 −10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	87 +8.8%	80−85 −8.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	61 +10.9%	55−60 −10.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

108
+8%

100−105

−8%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	70−75 +7.7%	65−70 −7.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	75 +7.1%	70−75 −7.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	56 +12%	50−55 −12%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 +14.3%	35−40 −14.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55 +10%	50−55 −10%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +3.7%	27−30 −3.7%
Far Cry 5	60 +9.1%	55−60 −9.1%
Forza Horizon 4	200−210 +3.5%	200−210 −3.5%
Hitman 3	61 +10.9%	55−60 −10.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	75−80 +4%	75−80 −4%
Metro Exodus	89 +4.7%	85−90 −4.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	85−90 +8.8%	80−85 −8.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 +4%	50−55 −4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	180−190 +8.2%	170−180 −8.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

84
+5%

80−85

−5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +20%	30−33 −20%
Far Cry New Dawn	41 +17.1%	35−40 −17.1%
Hitman 3	30−33 +11.1%	27−30 −11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	170−180 +8.1%	160−170 −8.1%
Metro Exodus	67 +11.7%	60−65 −11.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	59 +7.3%	55−60 −7.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	36 +20%	30−33 −20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +4.8%	21−24 −4.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	32 +6.7%	30−33 −6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +20%	10−11 −20%
Far Cry 5	31 +3.3%	30−33 −3.3%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +11.1%	45−50 −11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 +8.9%	45−50 −8.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	25 +4.2%	24−27 −4.2%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

43
+7.5%

40−45

−7.5%

This is how RTX 2070 Super Mobile and RTX A2000 12 GB compete in popular games:

RTX 2070 Super Mobile is 9% faster in 1080p
RTX 2070 Super Mobile is 10% faster in 1440p
RTX 2070 Super Mobile is 13% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	36.67	35.55
Recency	2 April 2020	23 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	115 Watt	70 Watt

RTX 2070 Super Mobile has a 3.2% higher aggregate performance score.

RTX A2000 12 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 64.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile and RTX A2000 12 GB.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile is a notebook card while RTX A2000 12 GB is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.