GeForce GTX 760 vs Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) with GeForce GTX 760, including specs and performance data.

Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
2022
4.43

GTX 760 outperforms Graphics (Ryzen 7000) by a whopping 181% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking667400
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.51
Power efficiencyno data5.02
ArchitectureRDNA 2 (2022−2023)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameRaphaelGK104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date26 September 2022 (2 years ago)25 June 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1281152
Core clock speedno data980 MHz
Boost clock speed2200 MHz1033 MHz
Number of transistorsno data3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data170 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data97 °C
Texture fill rateno data99.07
Floating-point processing powerno data2.378 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data96

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Widthno data2-slot
Minimum recommended system powerno data500 Watt
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1502 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort
Multi monitor supportno data4 displays
HDMI-+
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D-+
3D Gaming-+
3D Vision-+
PhysX-+
3D Vision Live-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.3
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Graphics (Ryzen 7000) 4.43
GTX 760 12.45
+181%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Graphics (Ryzen 7000) 3026
GTX 760 7962
+163%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Graphics (Ryzen 7000) 11703
GTX 760 29073
+148%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Graphics (Ryzen 7000) 2338
GTX 760 5959
+155%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Graphics (Ryzen 7000) 15247
GTX 760 40150
+163%

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

Graphics (Ryzen 7000) 11455
+15133%
GTX 760 75

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD17
−300%
68
+300%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.66

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−138%
18−20
+138%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−142%
27−30
+142%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−375%
18−20
+375%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−300%
40−45
+300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−150%
24−27
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−138%
18−20
+138%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−222%
27−30
+222%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−183%
30−35
+183%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−215%
80−85
+215%
Hitman 3 10−11
−130%
21−24
+130%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−124%
65−70
+124%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−356%
40−45
+356%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−209%
30−35
+209%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−150%
40−45
+150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−61.4%
70−75
+61.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−142%
27−30
+142%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−375%
18−20
+375%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−300%
40−45
+300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−150%
24−27
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−138%
18−20
+138%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−222%
27−30
+222%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−183%
30−35
+183%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−215%
80−85
+215%
Hitman 3 10−11
−130%
21−24
+130%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−124%
65−70
+124%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−356%
40−45
+356%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−209%
30−35
+209%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 11
−264%
40−45
+264%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−82.4%
30−35
+82.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−61.4%
70−75
+61.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−142%
27−30
+142%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−375%
18−20
+375%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−150%
24−27
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−138%
18−20
+138%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−222%
27−30
+222%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−215%
80−85
+215%
Hitman 3 10−11
−130%
21−24
+130%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9
−622%
65−70
+622%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9
−344%
40−45
+344%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−82.4%
30−35
+82.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−61.4%
70−75
+61.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−209%
30−35
+209%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−171%
18−20
+171%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−225%
12−14
+225%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−771%
60−65
+771%
Hitman 3 9−10
−66.7%
14−16
+66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−150%
24−27
+150%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−1900%
20−22
+1900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−189%
75−80
+189%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−150%
20−22
+150%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Hitman 3 0−1 8−9
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−2850%
55−60
+2850%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−1000%
10−12
+1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 10−12

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 2−3
Far Cry 5 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−120%
10−12
+120%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

This is how Graphics (Ryzen 7000) and GTX 760 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 760 is 300% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 760 is 2850% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 760 is ahead in 66 tests (96%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.43 12.45
Recency 26 September 2022 25 June 2013
Chip lithography 6 nm 28 nm

Graphics (Ryzen 7000) has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 760, on the other hand, has a 181% higher aggregate performance score.

The GeForce GTX 760 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 760 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
GeForce GTX 760

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 243 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 2113 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.