RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs Radeon 780M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 780M with RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 780M
2023
54 Watt
18.34

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation outperforms Radeon 780M by a whopping 210% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking28335
Place by popularity57not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 3Ada Lovelace
GPU code namePhoenixAD104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 January 2023 (1 year ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7686144
Core clock speed1500 MHzno data
Boost clock speed3000 MHz1565 MHz
Number of transistors25,390 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)54 Watt (35 - 54 Watt TGP)70 Watt
Texture fill rate139.2300.5

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon 780M and RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared20 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared160 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared14 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data280.0 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDAno data8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon 780M 18.34
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 56.80
+210%

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation outperforms Radeon 780M by 210% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Radeon 780M 7083
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 21935
+210%

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation outperforms Radeon 780M by 210% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD36
−206%
110−120
+206%
1440p21
−210%
65−70
+210%
4K14
−186%
40−45
+186%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−225%
39
+225%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−260%
35−40
+260%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−210%
30−35
+210%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−233%
60−65
+233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−270%
35−40
+270%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−210%
31
+210%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−258%
40−45
+258%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−250%
45−50
+250%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−211%
80−85
+211%
Hitman 3 10−11
−260%
35−40
+260%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−223%
97
+223%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−239%
60−65
+239%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−219%
50−55
+219%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−256%
64
+256%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
−242%
41
+242%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−260%
35−40
+260%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−210%
30−35
+210%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−233%
60−65
+233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−270%
35−40
+270%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−243%
24
+243%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−258%
40−45
+258%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−250%
45−50
+250%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−211%
80−85
+211%
Hitman 3 10−11
−260%
35−40
+260%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−248%
70−75
+248%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−250%
21
+250%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−219%
50−55
+219%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−231%
53
+231%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−229%
46
+229%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
−211%
55−60
+211%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−260%
35−40
+260%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−210%
30−35
+210%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−270%
35−40
+270%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−229%
23
+229%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−258%
40−45
+258%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−211%
80−85
+211%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−231%
53
+231%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−229%
46
+229%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−222%
29
+222%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−260%
18
+260%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−219%
50−55
+219%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−260%
35−40
+260%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−217%
18−20
+217%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−229%
21−24
+229%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−238%
27
+238%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−260%
35−40
+260%
Hitman 3 7−8
−214%
21−24
+214%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−270%
35−40
+270%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−240%
30−35
+240%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−220%
32
+220%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−233%
20
+233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Hitman 3 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
−233%
20−22
+233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−275%
15
+275%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−267%
10−12
+267%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 3−4
Far Cry 5 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−213%
24−27
+213%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
−233%
20−22
+233%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−240%
16−18
+240%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%

This is how Radeon 780M and RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is 206% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is 210% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is 186% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.34 56.80
Recency 5 January 2023 21 March 2023
Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 54 Watt 70 Watt

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 780M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 780M is a notebook card while RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1095 votes

Rate Radeon 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 45 votes

Rate RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.