RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile vs Radeon 780M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 780M with RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 780M
2023
15 Watt
18.32

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms 780M by a whopping 172% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking30262
Place by popularity49not in top-100
Power efficiency83.6929.64
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code namePhoenixno data
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7685120
Core clock speed800 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2700 MHzno data
Number of transistors25,390 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology4 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt115 Watt (60 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate129.6no data
Floating-point processing power8.294 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs48no data
Ray Tracing Cores12no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared16000 MHz
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.3-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon 780M 18.32
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 49.74
+172%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 780M 7059
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 19163
+171%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Radeon 780M 12785
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 41630
+226%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Radeon 780M 7987
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 29248
+266%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Radeon 780M 2822
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 12806
+354%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD36
−164%
95−100
+164%
1440p20
−150%
50−55
+150%
4K13
−169%
35−40
+169%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 39
−156%
100−105
+156%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−168%
110−120
+168%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
−167%
80−85
+167%
Battlefield 5 60−65
−167%
160−170
+167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−170%
100−105
+170%
Cyberpunk 2077 31
−158%
80−85
+158%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−156%
110−120
+156%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−165%
130−140
+165%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−161%
300−310
+161%
Hitman 3 35−40
−171%
95−100
+171%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
−167%
240−250
+167%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−170%
170−180
+170%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−165%
130−140
+165%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
−167%
160−170
+167%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−164%
230−240
+164%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−168%
110−120
+168%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
−167%
80−85
+167%
Battlefield 5 60−65
−167%
160−170
+167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−170%
100−105
+170%
Cyberpunk 2077 24
−171%
65−70
+171%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−156%
110−120
+156%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−165%
130−140
+165%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−161%
300−310
+161%
Hitman 3 35−40
−171%
95−100
+171%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
−167%
240−250
+167%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−170%
170−180
+170%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−165%
130−140
+165%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 54
−159%
140−150
+159%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−162%
110−120
+162%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−164%
230−240
+164%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−168%
110−120
+168%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
−167%
80−85
+167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−170%
100−105
+170%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
−161%
60−65
+161%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−156%
110−120
+156%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−161%
300−310
+161%
Hitman 3 35−40
−171%
95−100
+171%
Horizon Zero Dawn 53
−164%
140−150
+164%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 46
−161%
120−130
+161%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29
−159%
75−80
+159%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18
−150%
45−50
+150%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−165%
130−140
+165%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−171%
95−100
+171%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−168%
75−80
+168%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−163%
50−55
+163%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−150%
40−45
+150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−150%
50−55
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−162%
55−60
+162%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
−170%
270−280
+170%
Hitman 3 21−24
−150%
55−60
+150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−170%
100−105
+170%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−165%
90−95
+165%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 32
−166%
85−90
+166%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
−150%
50−55
+150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
−164%
290−300
+164%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
−167%
80−85
+167%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−150%
45−50
+150%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−150%
35−40
+150%
Hitman 3 14−16
−150%
35−40
+150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
−166%
250−260
+166%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−163%
50−55
+163%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
−167%
40−45
+167%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−160%
65−70
+160%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17
−165%
45−50
+165%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−150%
40−45
+150%

This is how Radeon 780M and RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is 164% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is 150% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is 169% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.32 49.74
Recency 4 January 2023 21 March 2023
Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 115 Watt

Radeon 780M has a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 666.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 171.5% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 months.

The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 780M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 780M is a notebook graphics card while RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1549 votes

Rate Radeon 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 7 votes

Rate RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.