Tesla M6 Mobile vs Radeon 760M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking352not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 3 (2022−2023)Maxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)
GPU code namePhoenixGM204
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date5 January 2023 (1 year ago)30 August 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5121536
Core clock speed1500 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2800 MHz1180 MHz
Number of transistors25,390 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)54 Watt (35 - 54 Watt TGP)100 Watt
Texture fill rate67.20113.3
Floating-point performance4.301 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data5 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data160.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-5.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 January 2023 30 August 2015
Chip lithography 4 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 54 Watt 100 Watt

Radeon 760M has an age advantage of 7 years, a 600% more advanced lithography process, and 85.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 760M and Tesla M6 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 760M is a notebook graphics card while Tesla M6 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 760M
Radeon 760M
NVIDIA Tesla M6 Mobile
Tesla M6 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 141 vote

Rate Radeon 760M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 6 votes

Rate Tesla M6 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.