Arc 7-Core iGPU vs Radeon 780M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 780M and Arc 7-Core iGPU, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Radeon 780M
2023
15 Watt
18.32
+4.6%

780M outperforms Arc 7-Core iGPU by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking302313
Place by popularity49not in top-100
Power efficiency83.73no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code namePhoenixMeteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7687
Core clock speed800 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2700 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors25,390 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology4 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate129.6no data
Floating-point processing power8.294 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs48no data
Ray Tracing Cores12no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem Sharedno data
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_2
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.3-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon 780M 18.32
+4.6%
Arc 7-Core iGPU 17.52

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Radeon 780M 12785
+11.2%
Arc 7-Core iGPU 11498

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Radeon 780M 41622
+10.3%
Arc 7-Core iGPU 37719

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Radeon 780M 7987
Arc 7-Core iGPU 8133
+1.8%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Radeon 780M 48112
+17.3%
Arc 7-Core iGPU 41031

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Radeon 780M 429810
+8.3%
Arc 7-Core iGPU 396714

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Radeon 780M 2822
Arc 7-Core iGPU 3103
+10%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD36
+2.9%
35
−2.9%
1440p20
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
4K13
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 39
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+5.1%
35−40
−5.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
+7.1%
27−30
−7.1%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+7.1%
55−60
−7.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 31
+14.8%
27−30
−14.8%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+7.5%
40−45
−7.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+4.3%
45−50
−4.3%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+5.5%
100−110
−5.5%
Hitman 3 35−40
+6.1%
30−35
−6.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+5.9%
85−90
−5.9%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+6.8%
55−60
−6.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+4.3%
45−50
−4.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
+7.1%
55−60
−7.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+3.6%
80−85
−3.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+5.1%
35−40
−5.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
+7.1%
27−30
−7.1%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+7.1%
55−60
−7.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 24
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+7.5%
40−45
−7.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+4.3%
45−50
−4.3%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+5.5%
100−110
−5.5%
Hitman 3 35−40
+6.1%
30−35
−6.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+5.9%
85−90
−5.9%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+6.8%
55−60
−6.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+4.3%
45−50
−4.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 54
+0%
54
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+5%
40−45
−5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+3.6%
80−85
−3.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+5.1%
35−40
−5.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
+7.1%
27−30
−7.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+7.5%
40−45
−7.5%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+5.5%
100−110
−5.5%
Hitman 3 35−40
+6.1%
30−35
−6.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 53
−60.4%
85−90
+60.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 46
+4.5%
44
−4.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29
+26.1%
23
−26.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18
−367%
80−85
+367%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+4.3%
45−50
−4.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+6.1%
30−35
−6.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+7.7%
24−27
−7.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+11.8%
16−18
−11.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+5.3%
18−20
−5.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+5%
20−22
−5%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
+7.5%
90−95
−7.5%
Hitman 3 21−24
+10%
20−22
−10%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+9.7%
30−35
−9.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 32
−3.1%
30−35
+3.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
+5.3%
18−20
−5.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+5.8%
100−110
−5.8%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+7.1%
27−30
−7.1%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+5.9%
16−18
−5.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+7.7%
12−14
−7.7%
Hitman 3 14−16
+7.7%
12−14
−7.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+6.8%
85−90
−6.8%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
−13.3%
16−18
+13.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+8.7%
21−24
−8.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%

This is how Radeon 780M and Arc 7-Core iGPU compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 780M is 3% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon 780M is 11% faster in 1440p
  • Radeon 780M is 8% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Radeon 780M is 26% faster.
  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc 7-Core iGPU is 367% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Radeon 780M is ahead in 60 tests (91%)
  • Arc 7-Core iGPU is ahead in 5 tests (8%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.32 17.52
Recency 4 January 2023 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm

Radeon 780M has a 4.6% higher aggregate performance score, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

Arc 7-Core iGPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon 780M and Arc 7-Core iGPU.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
Arc 7-Core iGPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1547 votes

Rate Radeon 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 7 votes

Rate Arc 7-Core iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.