GeForce 9800S vs ATI Radeon 7500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameRV200G94
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date14 August 2001 (23 years ago)15 July 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data64
Core clock speed290 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors60 million505 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate1.74019.20
Floating-point processing powerno data0.192 TFLOPS
ROPs216
TMUs632

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 2.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount64 MB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed230 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth7.36 GB/s51.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoVGAHDMISingle Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF + HDA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.011.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGL1.32.1
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 August 2001 15 July 2008
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 75 Watt

ATI 7500 has 226.1% lower power consumption.

GeForce 9800S, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 130.8% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 7500 and GeForce 9800S. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 7500 is a desktop card while GeForce 9800S is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 7500
Radeon 7500
NVIDIA GeForce 9800S
GeForce 9800S

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 46 votes

Rate Radeon 7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2 votes

Rate GeForce 9800S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.