GeForce MX570 vs Quadro 1000M

Place in the ranking	995	358
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.18	no data
Power efficiency	2.24	40.98
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	GF108	GA107
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	13 January 2011 (14 years ago)	May 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$174.95	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	2048
Core clock speed	700 MHz	832 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1155 MHz
Number of transistors	585 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	25 Watt
Texture fill rate	11.20	73.92
Floating-point processing power	0.2688 TFLOPS	4.731 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	40
TMUs	16	64
Tensor Cores	no data	64
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s	96 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	2.1	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro 1000M 1.37

GeForce MX570 13.90
+915%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro 1000M 564

GeForce MX570 5729
+916%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

43
+4.9%

−4.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

4.07

no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −257%	24−27 +257%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −480%	27−30 +480%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −2300%	45−50 +2300%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −257%	24−27 +257%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −480%	27−30 +480%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −578%	60−65 +578%
Metro Exodus	0−1	40−45
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −414%	35−40 +414%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −2300%	45−50 +2300%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −257%	24−27 +257%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −480%	27−30 +480%
Dota 2	2−3 −500%	12 +500%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −467%	68 +467%
Fortnite	6−7 −1283%	80−85 +1283%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −578%	60−65 +578%
Grand Theft Auto V	2−3 −2550%	50−55 +2550%
Metro Exodus	0−1	40−45
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	16−18 −569%	100−110 +569%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −414%	35−40 +414%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −543%	45−50 +543%
World of Tanks	30−33 −543%	190−200 +543%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −2300%	45−50 +2300%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −85.7%	13 +85.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −480%	27−30 +480%
Dota 2	2−3 −2600%	50−55 +2600%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −350%	50−55 +350%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −578%	60−65 +578%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	16−18 −569%	100−110 +569%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	9−10 −1411%	130−140 +1411%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	12−14
World of Tanks	9−10 −1056%	100−110 +1056%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −267%	10−12 +267%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −620%	35−40 +620%
Forza Horizon 5	1−2 −2200%	21−24 +2200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −300%	20−22 +300%
Valorant	7−8 −429%	35−40 +429%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	0−1	8−9
Dota 2	16−18 −62.5%	24−27 +62.5%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −73.3%	24−27 +73.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	4−5 −1000%	40−45 +1000%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	10−11
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −73.3%	24−27 +73.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −1300%	14−16 +1300%
Counter-Strike 2	0−1	8−9
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Dota 2	16−18 −62.5%	24−27 +62.5%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −1800%	18−20 +1800%
Valorant	1−2 −1500%	16−18 +1500%