ATI FirePro V4800 vs ATI Radeon 7500

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1520not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.03no data
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameRV200Redwood
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date14 August 2001 (23 years ago)26 April 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$189

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data400
Core clock speed290 MHz775 MHz
Number of transistors60 million627 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt69 Watt
Texture fill rate1.74015.50
Floating-point processing powerno data0.62 TFLOPS
ROPs28
TMUs620

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount64 MB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed230 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth7.36 GB/s57.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.011.2 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGL1.34.4
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 August 2001 26 April 2010
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 69 Watt

ATI 7500 has 200% lower power consumption.

ATI V4800, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 7500 and FirePro V4800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 7500 is a desktop card while FirePro V4800 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 7500
Radeon 7500
ATI FirePro V4800
FirePro V4800

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 46 votes

Rate Radeon 7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 55 votes

Rate FirePro V4800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.