Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs Radeon 630

Place in the ranking	703	530
Place by popularity	not in top-100	73
Power efficiency	5.41	18.61
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code name	Polaris 23	Tiger Lake Xe
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	13 May 2019 (5 years ago)	15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	80
Core clock speed	1082 MHz	400 MHz
Boost clock speed	1218 MHz	1350 MHz
Number of transistors	2,200 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	28 Watt
Texture fill rate	38.98	no data
Floating-point processing power	1.247 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	16	no data
TMUs	32	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	no data
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	no data
Memory bus width	128 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	112.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	no data
HDMI	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12_1
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	2.0	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	9−10 −111%	19 +111%
1440p	5−6 −100%	10 +100%
4K	7−8 −114%	15 +114%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−12 +0%	11 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −75%	14 +75%
Elden Ring	9−10 −100%	18 +100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 −118%	24−27 +118%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 +22.2%	9 −22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −50%	12 +50%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −76.5%	30 +76.5%
Metro Exodus	8−9 −238%	27 +238%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −61.5%	21−24 +61.5%
Valorant	6−7 −200%	18 +200%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 −118%	24−27 +118%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 +10%	10 −10%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +60%	5 −60%
Dota 2	12−14 −83.3%	22 +83.3%
Elden Ring	9−10 −88.9%	17 +88.9%
Far Cry 5	20−22 −30%	26 +30%
Fortnite	21−24 −95.7%	45−50 +95.7%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −41.2%	24 +41.2%
Grand Theft Auto V	12−14 −8.3%	13 +8.3%
Metro Exodus	8−9 −113%	17 +113%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 −79.4%	60−65 +79.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +117%	6 −117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −76.9%	21−24 +76.9%
Valorant	6−7 −133%	14 +133%
World of Tanks	65−70 −71.6%	110−120 +71.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 −118%	24−27 +118%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 +120%	5 −120%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +100%	4 −100%
Dota 2	12−14 −200%	36 +200%
Far Cry 5	20−22 −65%	30−35 +65%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −17.6%	20 +17.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 −79.4%	60−65 +79.4%
Valorant	6−7 −317%	24−27 +317%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	2−3 −200%	6 +200%
Elden Ring	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Grand Theft Auto V	3−4 −100%	6 +100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 −48.1%	40−45 +48.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
World of Tanks	27−30 −96.4%	55−60 +96.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −77.8%	16−18 +77.8%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −300%	16 +300%
Metro Exodus	0−1	12−14
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −100%	10 +100%
Valorant	12−14 −58.3%	18−20 +58.3%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −12.5%	18−20 +12.5%
Elden Ring	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −12.5%	18−20 +12.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	10−12 −100%	21−24 +100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −12.5%	18−20 +12.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Dota 2	16−18 +0%	16 +0%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −125%	9−10 +125%
Fortnite	3−4 −133%	7−8 +133%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%
Valorant	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Metro Exodus	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2

1−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

This is how Radeon 630 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs compete in popular games:

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 111% faster in 1080p
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 100% faster in 1440p
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 114% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Radeon 630 is 120% faster.
in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 317% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Radeon 630 is ahead in 6 tests (10%)
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is ahead in 51 test (82%)
there's a draw in 5 tests (8%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.93	7.57
Recency	13 May 2019	15 August 2020
Chip lithography	14 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	28 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs has a 92.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 78.6% lower power consumption.

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 630 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.