RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs Radeon 625

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 625 and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Radeon 625
2019
2 GB DDR3, 50 Watt
2.84

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms 625 by a whopping 1288% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking789109
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.9323.73
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code namePolaris 24no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date13 May 2019 (5 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3843072
Core clock speed730 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1024 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,550 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate24.58no data
Floating-point processing power0.7864 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs24no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon 625 2.84
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 39.43
+1288%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 625 1094
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 15212
+1290%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−1233%
120−130
+1233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Battlefield 5 4−5
−1275%
55−60
+1275%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−1257%
95−100
+1257%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−1257%
95−100
+1257%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−1257%
190−200
+1257%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−1264%
300−310
+1264%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−1257%
95−100
+1257%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−1233%
160−170
+1233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−1216%
500−550
+1216%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−1233%
120−130
+1233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Battlefield 5 4−5
−1275%
55−60
+1275%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−1257%
95−100
+1257%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−1257%
95−100
+1257%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−1257%
190−200
+1257%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−1264%
300−310
+1264%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−1257%
95−100
+1257%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−1233%
160−170
+1233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−1257%
190−200
+1257%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−1216%
500−550
+1216%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−1233%
120−130
+1233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−1257%
95−100
+1257%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−1257%
190−200
+1257%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−1264%
300−310
+1264%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−1233%
160−170
+1233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−1257%
190−200
+1257%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−1216%
500−550
+1216%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−1257%
95−100
+1257%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−1275%
55−60
+1275%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−1257%
95−100
+1257%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−1253%
230−240
+1253%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−1233%
80−85
+1233%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−1275%
55−60
+1275%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.84 39.43
Recency 13 May 2019 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 115 Watt

Radeon 625 has 130% lower power consumption.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 1288.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 625 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 625
Radeon 625
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 140 votes

Rate Radeon 625 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 18 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.