RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs Radeon 630

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 630 with RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 630
2019
2 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
3.72

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms 630 by a whopping 965% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking709111
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.1023.61
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code namePolaris 23no data
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date13 May 2019 (5 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5123072
Core clock speed1082 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1218 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate38.98no data
Floating-point processing power1.247 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon 630 3.72
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 39.61
+965%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 630 1434
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 15262
+964%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−900%
60−65
+900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−900%
100−105
+900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Battlefield 5 6−7
−900%
60−65
+900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−963%
85−90
+963%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−900%
60−65
+900%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−900%
70−75
+900%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−956%
95−100
+956%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−953%
200−210
+953%
Hitman 3 8−9
−963%
85−90
+963%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−942%
250−260
+942%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−900%
50−55
+900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−963%
85−90
+963%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−900%
130−140
+900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−900%
400−450
+900%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−900%
100−105
+900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Battlefield 5 6−7
−900%
60−65
+900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−963%
85−90
+963%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−900%
60−65
+900%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−900%
70−75
+900%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−956%
95−100
+956%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−953%
200−210
+953%
Hitman 3 8−9
−963%
85−90
+963%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−942%
250−260
+942%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−900%
50−55
+900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−963%
85−90
+963%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−900%
130−140
+900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−900%
150−160
+900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−900%
400−450
+900%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−900%
100−105
+900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−963%
85−90
+963%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−900%
60−65
+900%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−900%
70−75
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−953%
200−210
+953%
Hitman 3 8−9
−963%
85−90
+963%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−942%
250−260
+942%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−900%
130−140
+900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−900%
150−160
+900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−900%
400−450
+900%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−963%
85−90
+963%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−900%
60−65
+900%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−900%
50−55
+900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
Hitman 3 8−9
−963%
85−90
+963%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−963%
85−90
+963%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Watch Dogs: Legion 20−22
−950%
210−220
+950%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−900%
70−75
+900%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.72 39.61
Recency 13 May 2019 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 115 Watt

Radeon 630 has 130% lower power consumption.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 964.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 630 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 630 is a notebook graphics card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 630
Radeon 630
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 32 votes

Rate Radeon 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 19 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.