GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Radeon 625

Place in the ranking	797	294
Place by popularity	not in top-100	18
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Polaris 24	GN20-S7
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	12 August 2019 (5 years ago)	17 December 2021 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	2048
Boost clock speed	1024 MHz	1477 MHz
Number of transistors	1,550 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	30-45 Watt
Texture fill rate	24.58	189.1
Floating-point processing power	0.7864 gflops	6.05 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3, GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	2250 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	112.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMI	-	+
G-SYNC support	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.3	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	-	8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	6−7 −633%	44 +633%
1440p	4−5 −625%	29 +625%
4K	4−5 −675%	31 +675%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

5−6

−880%

49
+880%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −367%	40−45 +367%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −4100%	42 +4100%
Battlefield 5	4−5 −1425%	60−65 +1425%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −443%	35−40 +443%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −740%	42 +740%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −780%	40−45 +780%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −614%	50−55 +614%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −736%	110−120 +736%
Hitman 3	8−9 −450%	44 +450%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −314%	90−95 +314%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −2033%	60−65 +2033%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −614%	50−55 +614%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −408%	60−65 +408%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −132%	85−90 +132%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −367%	40−45 +367%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −2000%	21 +2000%
Battlefield 5	4−5 −1425%	60−65 +1425%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −443%	35−40 +443%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −500%	30 +500%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −780%	40−45 +780%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −614%	50−55 +614%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −736%	110−120 +736%
Hitman 3	8−9 −438%	43 +438%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −314%	90−95 +314%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −2033%	60−65 +2033%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −614%	50−55 +614%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −417%	62 +417%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −200%	40−45 +200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −132%	85−90 +132%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −367%	40−45 +367%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −600%	7 +600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −443%	35−40 +443%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −400%	25 +400%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −780%	40−45 +780%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −736%	110−120 +736%
Hitman 3	8−9 −388%	39 +388%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −314%	90−95 +314%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −358%	55 +358%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −136%	33 +136%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +111%	18 −111%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

7−8

−614%

50−55
+614%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 −620%	35−40 +620%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −600%	27−30 +600%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −850%	18−20 +850%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1000%	10−12 +1000%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −633%	21−24 +633%
Hitman 3	8−9 −175%	21−24 +175%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −443%	35−40 +443%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 −553%	110−120 +553%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7

−417%

30−35
+417%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −1700%	18−20 +1700%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −600%	14−16 +600%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −450%	10−12 +450%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	24−27
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	8−9

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−300%

16−18
+300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	47 +0%	47 +0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Metro Exodus	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%

This is how Radeon 625 and RTX 2050 Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 2050 Mobile is 633% faster in 1080p
RTX 2050 Mobile is 625% faster in 1440p
RTX 2050 Mobile is 675% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Radeon 625 is 111% faster.
in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 2050 Mobile is 4100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Radeon 625 is ahead in 1 test (1%)
RTX 2050 Mobile is ahead in 59 tests (84%)
there's a draw in 10 tests (14%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.79	18.62
Recency	12 August 2019	17 December 2021
Chip lithography	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	30 Watt

RTX 2050 Mobile has a 567.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 625 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.