GeForce MX450 vs Radeon 625

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 625 and GeForce MX450, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Radeon 625
2019
2 GB DDR3, 50 Watt
2.84

MX450 outperforms 625 by a whopping 241% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking794460
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.8926.57
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code namePolaris 24N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date13 May 2019 (5 years ago)1 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384896
Core clock speed730 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speed1024 MHz1575 MHz
Number of transistors1,550 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt25 Watt (12 - 29 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate24.58100.8
Floating-point processing power0.7864 TFLOPS3.226 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2464

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x4
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5, GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz10000 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s64.03 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.36.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon 625 2.84
GeForce MX450 9.69
+241%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 625 1094
GeForce MX450 3734
+241%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8−9
−263%
29
+263%
1440p5−6
−260%
18
+260%
4K8−9
−275%
30
+275%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−540%
32
+540%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−156%
21−24
+156%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−900%
10
+900%
Battlefield 5 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−186%
20−22
+186%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−340%
22
+340%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−340%
21−24
+340%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−286%
27−30
+286%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−357%
60−65
+357%
Hitman 3 8−9
−275%
30
+275%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−141%
50−55
+141%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−1733%
55
+1733%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−543%
45
+543%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−167%
30−35
+167%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−147%
94
+147%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−156%
21−24
+156%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−500%
6
+500%
Battlefield 5 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−186%
20−22
+186%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−160%
13
+160%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−340%
21−24
+340%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−286%
27−30
+286%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−357%
60−65
+357%
Hitman 3 8−9
−263%
29
+263%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−141%
50−55
+141%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−1133%
37
+1133%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−286%
27−30
+286%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−233%
40
+233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−85.7%
24−27
+85.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−134%
89
+134%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−156%
21−24
+156%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1000%
11
+1000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−186%
20−22
+186%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−60%
8
+60%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−340%
21−24
+340%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−357%
60−65
+357%
Hitman 3 8−9
−213%
25
+213%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−9.1%
24
+9.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−150%
30
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−42.9%
20
+42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+443%
7
−443%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−343%
31
+343%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−280%
18−20
+280%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−275%
14−16
+275%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−267%
10−12
+267%
Hitman 3 8−9
−125%
18
+125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−186%
20−22
+186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−259%
60−65
+259%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−333%
26
+333%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 12−14
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 3−4

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7
+0%
7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18
+0%
18
+0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

This is how Radeon 625 and GeForce MX450 compete in popular games:

  • GeForce MX450 is 263% faster in 1080p
  • GeForce MX450 is 260% faster in 1440p
  • GeForce MX450 is 275% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Radeon 625 is 443% faster.
  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GeForce MX450 is 1733% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Radeon 625 is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • GeForce MX450 is ahead in 59 tests (84%)
  • there's a draw in 10 tests (14%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.84 9.69
Recency 13 May 2019 1 August 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 25 Watt

GeForce MX450 has a 241.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The GeForce MX450 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 625 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 625
Radeon 625
NVIDIA GeForce MX450
GeForce MX450

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 145 votes

Rate Radeon 625 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 1322 votes

Rate GeForce MX450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.