Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs Radeon 620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 620 and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Radeon 620
2019
2 GB DDR3, 50 Watt
2.39

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) outperforms 620 by a whopping 336% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking846440
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.29no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code namePolaris 24Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date13 May 2019 (5 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3844
Core clock speed730 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1024 MHz1950 MHz
Number of transistors1,550 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Wattno data
Texture fill rate24.58no data
Floating-point processing power0.7864 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs24no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed900 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12_2
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon 620 2.39
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) 10.42
+336%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Radeon 620 1730
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) 5295
+206%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD5−6
−400%
25
+400%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−30%
13
+30%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Elden Ring 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−580%
30−35
+580%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−10%
11
+10%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−317%
50
+317%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−580%
30−35
+580%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−30%
13
+30%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Dota 2 6−7
−150%
15
+150%
Elden Ring 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−60%
24
+60%
Fortnite 12−14
−369%
60−65
+369%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−225%
39
+225%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
−150%
15
+150%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−833%
27−30
+833%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−248%
80−85
+248%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−210%
30−35
+210%
World of Tanks 40−45
−239%
140−150
+239%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−580%
30−35
+580%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−90%
18−20
+90%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Dota 2 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−180%
40−45
+180%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−150%
30
+150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−248%
80−85
+248%

1440p
High Preset

Elden Ring 1−2
−1400%
14−16
+1400%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 14−16
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−206%
45−50
+206%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
World of Tanks 16−18
−369%
75−80
+369%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−1900%
20−22
+1900%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−283%
21−24
+283%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−333%
12−14
+333%
Valorant 8−9
−225%
24−27
+225%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%
Elden Ring 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−33.3%
20−22
+33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−33.3%
20−22
+33.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Dota 2 16−18
−306%
65−70
+306%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−550%
12−14
+550%
Fortnite 1−2
−1000%
10−12
+1000%
Valorant 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

This is how Radeon 620 and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) compete in popular games:

  • Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is 400% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is 1900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is ahead in 42 tests (75%)
  • there's a draw in 14 tests (25%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.39 10.42
Recency 13 May 2019 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) has a 336% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 620 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 620
Radeon 620
Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 65 votes

Rate Radeon 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 7 votes

Rate Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.