Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs Radeon 610M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 610M and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Radeon 610M
2023
15 Watt
2.85

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) outperforms 610M by a whopping 272% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking792435
Place by popularity33not in top-100
Power efficiency13.03no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code nameDragon RangeMeteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 January 2023 (1 year ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1284
Core clock speed400 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2200 MHz1950 MHz
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate17.60no data
Floating-point processing power0.5632 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4no data
TMUs8no data
Ray Tracing Cores2no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem Sharedno data
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_2
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.3-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon 610M 2.85
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) 10.61
+272%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Radeon 610M 2863
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) 6776
+137%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Radeon 610M 1965
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) 5295
+169%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Radeon 610M 13898
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) 29765
+114%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Radeon 610M 164666
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) 295187
+79.3%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Radeon 610M 576
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) 1930
+235%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14
−85.7%
26
+85.7%
1440p79
−267%
290−300
+267%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−156%
21−24
+156%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−186%
20−22
+186%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−340%
21−24
+340%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−333%
65−70
+333%
Hitman 3 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−145%
50−55
+145%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−933%
30−35
+933%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−286%
27−30
+286%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−167%
30−35
+167%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−59%
60−65
+59%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−156%
21−24
+156%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−186%
20−22
+186%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−340%
21−24
+340%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−333%
65−70
+333%
Hitman 3 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−145%
50−55
+145%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−933%
30−35
+933%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−286%
27−30
+286%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14
−179%
39
+179%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−85.7%
24−27
+85.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−59%
60−65
+59%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−156%
21−24
+156%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−186%
20−22
+186%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−340%
21−24
+340%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−333%
65−70
+333%
Hitman 3 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−145%
50−55
+145%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10
−200%
30
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7
−129%
16
+129%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−59%
60−65
+59%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−286%
27−30
+286%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−280%
18−20
+280%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−275%
14−16
+275%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−267%
10−12
+267%
Hitman 3 8−9
−62.5%
12−14
+62.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−186%
20−22
+186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−265%
60−65
+265%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 12−14
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

This is how Radeon 610M and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) compete in popular games:

  • Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is 86% faster in 1080p
  • Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is 267% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is 1300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is ahead in 56 tests (86%)
  • there's a draw in 9 tests (14%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.85 10.61
Recency 3 January 2023 14 December 2023

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) has a 272.3% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 11 months.

The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 610M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 610M
Radeon 610M
Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 786 votes

Rate Radeon 610M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 7 votes

Rate Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.