ATI FireGL X1-128 vs Radeon 540

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking717not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.10no data
Power efficiency5.01no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameLexaR300
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date20 April 2017 (7 years ago)1 July 2002 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$79 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed1183 MHz325 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,200 million110 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Wattno data
Texture fill rate28.392.600
Floating-point processing power0.9085 TFLOPSno data
ROPs168
TMUs248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8AGP 8x
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB128 MB
Memory bus width32 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz310 MHz
Memory bandwidth24 GB/s19.84 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DisplayPort 1.4a2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 April 2017 1 July 2002
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 150 nm

Radeon 540 has an age advantage of 14 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 971.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 540 and FireGL X1-128. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 540 is a desktop card while FireGL X1-128 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 540
Radeon 540
ATI FireGL X1-128
FireGL X1-128

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 46 votes

Rate Radeon 540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL X1-128 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.