Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Quadro T1000 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro T1000 Mobile with Iris Plus Graphics 645, including specs and performance data.

T1000 Mobile
2019
4 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
16.95
+282%

T1000 Mobile outperforms Iris Plus Graphics 645 by a whopping 282% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking317658
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency23.4820.50
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameTU117Coffee Lake GT3e
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)7 October 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768384
Core clock speed1395 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHz1050 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate69.8450.40
Floating-point processing power2.235 TFLOPS0.8064 TFLOPS
ROPs326
TMUs4848

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T1000 Mobile 16.95
+282%
Iris Plus Graphics 645 4.44

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

T1000 Mobile 6540
+281%
Iris Plus Graphics 645 1715

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

T1000 Mobile 11377
+281%
Iris Plus Graphics 645 2985

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

T1000 Mobile 8727
+361%
Iris Plus Graphics 645 1893

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

T1000 Mobile 3261
+493%
Iris Plus Graphics 645 550

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD59
+127%
26
−127%
4K48
+300%
12−14
−300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+286%
7−8
−286%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 48
+336%
10−12
−336%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+833%
3−4
−833%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+511%
9−10
−511%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 53
+489%
9−10
−489%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+286%
7−8
−286%
Far Cry 5 49
+513%
8−9
−513%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+318%
10−12
−318%
Forza Horizon 4 119
+396%
24−27
−396%
Hitman 3 30−35
+256%
9−10
−256%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+211%
27−30
−211%
Metro Exodus 83
+938%
8−9
−938%
Red Dead Redemption 2 67
+570%
10−11
−570%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+267%
14−16
−267%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+95.3%
40−45
−95.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+245%
10−12
−245%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+833%
3−4
−833%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+511%
9−10
−511%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 47
+422%
9−10
−422%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+286%
7−8
−286%
Far Cry 5 41
+413%
8−9
−413%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+318%
10−12
−318%
Forza Horizon 4 114
+375%
24−27
−375%
Hitman 3 30−35
+256%
9−10
−256%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+211%
27−30
−211%
Metro Exodus 63
+688%
8−9
−688%
Red Dead Redemption 2 52
+420%
10−11
−420%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+267%
14−16
−267%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+144%
16−18
−144%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+95.3%
40−45
−95.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 29
+164%
10−12
−164%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+833%
3−4
−833%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 32
+256%
9−10
−256%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+286%
7−8
−286%
Far Cry 5 31
+288%
8−9
−288%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+350%
24−27
−350%
Hitman 3 30−35
+256%
9−10
−256%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+211%
27−30
−211%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+267%
14−16
−267%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35
+119%
16−18
−119%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+95.3%
40−45
−95.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50
+400%
10−11
−400%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+371%
7−8
−371%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+333%
6−7
−333%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+500%
3−4
−500%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+300%
5−6
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+2175%
4−5
−2175%
Hitman 3 20−22
+150%
8−9
−150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+278%
9−10
−278%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+288%
8−9
−288%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+300%
8−9
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+533%
3−4
−533%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+308%
24−27
−308%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+250%
8−9
−250%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Hitman 3 12−14 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+310%
21−24
−310%
Metro Exodus 16−18 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+1050%
2−3
−1050%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%

This is how T1000 Mobile and Iris Plus Graphics 645 compete in popular games:

  • T1000 Mobile is 127% faster in 1080p
  • T1000 Mobile is 300% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T1000 Mobile is 2175% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, T1000 Mobile surpassed Iris Plus Graphics 645 in all 63 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.95 4.44
Recency 27 May 2019 7 October 2019
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 15 Watt

T1000 Mobile has a 281.8% higher aggregate performance score, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

Iris Plus Graphics 645, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T1000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Plus Graphics 645 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T1000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile
Quadro T1000 Mobile
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
Iris Plus Graphics 645

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 153 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 116 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 645 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.