Quadro 3000M X2 vs RTX A5500 Mobile

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking77not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency19.01no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGA103EXMF104
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date22 March 2022 (2 years ago)22 February 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7424240
Core clock speed975 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHzno data
Number of transistors22,000 million1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate348.018.00
Floating-point processing power22.27 TFLOPS0.432 TFLOPS
ROPs9632
TMUs23240
Tensor Cores232no data
Ray Tracing Cores58no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz625 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.75.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.1
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA8.62.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 March 2022 22 February 2011
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 150 Watt

RTX A5500 Mobile has an age advantage of 11 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

3000M X2, on the other hand, has 10% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between RTX A5500 Mobile and Quadro 3000M X2. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile
RTX A5500 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro 3000M X2
Quadro 3000M X2

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 15 votes

Rate RTX A5500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro 3000M X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.